644491.pdf
Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes...
Γλώσσα: | ger |
---|---|
Έκδοση: |
Mohr Siebeck
2018
|
Διαθέσιμο Online: | https://www.mohr.de/en/book/der-abschreckungseffekt-auf-die-grundrechtsausuebung-9783161548383 |
id |
oapen-20.500.12657-30646 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-306462021-11-12T16:24:04Z Der Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung Staben, Julian Political Science Constitutional & administrative law philosophy of law theory of law Comparative law chilling effects Bundesverfassungsgericht German Federal Constitutional Court US Supreme Court jurisprudence LAW018000 LAW075000 LAW089000 LAW016000 LAW051000 LAW017000 LAW052000 LBG LAM LAB LND Abschreckung Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Grundrechte Grundrechte (Deutschland) Law Review Oberster Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten Rechtsprechung Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes to online behaviour and emerging digital practices and therefore call for their constitutional reassessment. Julian Staben's work enables a more methodologically reflective use of these arguments in the judicial discourse. 2018-01-01 23:55:55 2020-03-31 03:00:25 2020-04-01T13:05:48Z 2020-04-01T13:05:48Z 2017-12-12 book 644491 OCN: 1030820563 9783161554889 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30646 ger Internet und Gesellschaft application/pdf n/a 644491.pdf https://www.mohr.de/en/book/der-abschreckungseffekt-auf-die-grundrechtsausuebung-9783161548383 Mohr Siebeck 10.1628/9783161554889 101762 10.1628/9783161554889 773c36f2-8bde-4e8c-8b8d-7fab7b2879fe b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 9783161554889 Knowledge Unlatched (KU) 101762 KU Open Services Knowledge Unlatched open access |
institution |
OAPEN |
collection |
DSpace |
language |
ger |
description |
Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes to online behaviour and emerging digital practices and therefore call for their constitutional reassessment. Julian Staben's work enables a more methodologically reflective use of these arguments in the judicial discourse. |
title |
644491.pdf |
spellingShingle |
644491.pdf |
title_short |
644491.pdf |
title_full |
644491.pdf |
title_fullStr |
644491.pdf |
title_full_unstemmed |
644491.pdf |
title_sort |
644491.pdf |
publisher |
Mohr Siebeck |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.mohr.de/en/book/der-abschreckungseffekt-auf-die-grundrechtsausuebung-9783161548383 |
_version_ |
1771297477571379200 |