626403.pdf

Scholars of Edmund Spenser have focused much more on his accomplishments in epic and pastoral than his work in satire. Scholars of early modern English satire almost never discuss Spenser. However, these critical gaps stem from later developments in the canon rather than any insignificance in Spense...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Manchester University Press 2017
id oapen-20.500.12657-31616
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-316162021-11-04T14:07:37Z Spenserian Satire Hile, Rachel Literature Literature Literary criticism Renaissance European Literature Spenser Satire Allegory Edmund Spenser The Shepheardes Calender Thomas Nashe bic Book Industry Communication::D Literature & literary studies::DS Literature: history & criticism Scholars of Edmund Spenser have focused much more on his accomplishments in epic and pastoral than his work in satire. Scholars of early modern English satire almost never discuss Spenser. However, these critical gaps stem from later developments in the canon rather than any insignificance in Spenser's accomplishments and influence on satiric poetry. This book argues that the indirect form of satire developed by Spenser served during and after Spenser's lifetime as an important model for other poets who wished to convey satirical messages with some degree of safety. The book connects key Spenserian texts in The Shepheardes Calender and the Complaints volume with poems by a range of authors in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, including Joseph Hall, Thomas Nashe, Tailboys Dymoke, Thomas Middleton and George Wither, to advance the thesis that Spenser was seen by his contemporaries as highly relevant to satire in Elizabethan England. 2017-03-30 23:55 2020-03-12 03:00:30 2020-04-01T13:42:17Z 2020-04-01T13:42:17Z 2017-01-01 book 626403 OCN: 969416673 9781526125132 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31616 eng The Manchester Spenser application/pdf n/a 626403.pdf Manchester University Press 10.7228/manchester/9780719088087.001.0001 100058 10.7228/manchester/9780719088087.001.0001 6110b9b4-ba84-42ad-a0d8-f8d877957cdd b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 9781526125132 Knowledge Unlatched (KU) Manchester 100058 KU Select 2016 Front List Collection Knowledge Unlatched open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description Scholars of Edmund Spenser have focused much more on his accomplishments in epic and pastoral than his work in satire. Scholars of early modern English satire almost never discuss Spenser. However, these critical gaps stem from later developments in the canon rather than any insignificance in Spenser's accomplishments and influence on satiric poetry. This book argues that the indirect form of satire developed by Spenser served during and after Spenser's lifetime as an important model for other poets who wished to convey satirical messages with some degree of safety. The book connects key Spenserian texts in The Shepheardes Calender and the Complaints volume with poems by a range of authors in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, including Joseph Hall, Thomas Nashe, Tailboys Dymoke, Thomas Middleton and George Wither, to advance the thesis that Spenser was seen by his contemporaries as highly relevant to satire in Elizabethan England.
title 626403.pdf
spellingShingle 626403.pdf
title_short 626403.pdf
title_full 626403.pdf
title_fullStr 626403.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 626403.pdf
title_sort 626403.pdf
publisher Manchester University Press
publishDate 2017
_version_ 1771297615838707712