620294.pdf

This cross section study shows that school-intern further teacher training does not contribute to the achievement of objectives in the area of school development in Swiss vocational schools as it is intended by educational politics. Furthermore, it reveals that the questioned teachers do not think t...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:ger
Έκδοση: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers 2016
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/77845?rskey=eKF8Zz&result=1
id oapen-20.500.12657-32009
record_format dspace
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language ger
description This cross section study shows that school-intern further teacher training does not contribute to the achievement of objectives in the area of school development in Swiss vocational schools as it is intended by educational politics. Furthermore, it reveals that the questioned teachers do not think that school-intern further teacher training and school development influence their occupational situation in terms of lessons, occupational abilities and workday at all. Also most of them do not want any support service to implement such contents in their lessons. In consideration of these facts the lastingness and efficiency of both concepts are higly doubtful. The reasons for this outcome are diverse as this study shows. At first most examined vocational schools do not have a systematical concept of school-intern further teacher training and do not arrange their school development activities according to their superior programme. Therefore a connection between the field of school-intern further teacher training and school developement is not seen by the teachers and most of the experts. Above that both fields are in the area of responsibility of the school administration and do not involve the teaching staff. The objectives and superior programme of school development as well as measures of completed school development projects are not passed on to the teaching staff. In sum one can say that the desired development projects do not reach the teaching staff. Which is why they do not achieve the necessary reliability in order to develop the lessons of the teachers in a continuous improvement process any further.
title 620294.pdf
spellingShingle 620294.pdf
title_short 620294.pdf
title_full 620294.pdf
title_fullStr 620294.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 620294.pdf
title_sort 620294.pdf
publisher Peter Lang International Academic Publishers
publishDate 2016
url https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/77845?rskey=eKF8Zz&result=1
_version_ 1771297523324944384
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-320092022-04-26T11:21:06Z Schulentwicklung Fischer, Silke education for college vocational education and training efficiency of school development empirische pädagogik arbeitspädagogik berufsschulpädagogik school development wirtschaftspädagogik education for vocational school berufspädagogik school-intern further teacher training education professional education education for college vocational education and training efficiency of school development empirische pädagogik arbeitspädagogik berufsschulpädagogik school development wirtschaftspädagogik education for vocational school berufspädagogik school-intern further teacher training education professional education Erwachsenen- und Weiterbildung Experte Fragebogen Kanton Zürich Qualitätsmanagement Schulentwicklung Schulleitung This cross section study shows that school-intern further teacher training does not contribute to the achievement of objectives in the area of school development in Swiss vocational schools as it is intended by educational politics. Furthermore, it reveals that the questioned teachers do not think that school-intern further teacher training and school development influence their occupational situation in terms of lessons, occupational abilities and workday at all. Also most of them do not want any support service to implement such contents in their lessons. In consideration of these facts the lastingness and efficiency of both concepts are higly doubtful. The reasons for this outcome are diverse as this study shows. At first most examined vocational schools do not have a systematical concept of school-intern further teacher training and do not arrange their school development activities according to their superior programme. Therefore a connection between the field of school-intern further teacher training and school developement is not seen by the teachers and most of the experts. Above that both fields are in the area of responsibility of the school administration and do not involve the teaching staff. The objectives and superior programme of school development as well as measures of completed school development projects are not passed on to the teaching staff. In sum one can say that the desired development projects do not reach the teaching staff. Which is why they do not achieve the necessary reliability in order to develop the lessons of the teachers in a continuous improvement process any further. Die hier durchgeführte Querschnittsstudie evaluiert erstmalig, ob Schulen sich erfolgreich eigenständig – wie bildungspolitisch gefordert –, in sogenannte «problemlösende» Organisationseinheiten transformieren können, um ihren Unterricht im Rahmen der Schulentwicklung kontinuierlichen weiterzuentwickeln. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie stellen hierbei vor allem die Nachhaltigkeit von Schulentwicklung in Frage, da weder die Lehrpersonen noch Schulleitungsmitglieder an den evaluierten Berufsfachschulen der Meinung waren, dass Schulentwicklung den Unterricht und die beruflichen Fähigkeiten der Einzellehrperson überhaupt beeinflusst. Begründet liegt dieses Ergebnis u.a. in der von den Schulen vorgenommenen Implementierungsstrategie. So wird das Lehrerkollegium allgemein zu wenig in Entscheidungsprozesse involviert und beispielsweise nur unzureichend über den Zielerreichungrad und Maßnahmen abgeschlossener Schulentwicklungsprojekte informiert. 2016-11-25 00:00:00 2020-04-01T13:56:10Z 2019-03-28 23:55 2016-11-25 00:00:00 2020-04-01T13:56:10Z 2020-04-01T13:56:10Z 2016 book 620294 OCN: 982244963 9783653061444 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32009 ger application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 620294.pdf https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/77845?rskey=eKF8Zz&result=1 Peter Lang International Academic Publishers 10.3726/978-3-653-06144-4 [2] Die hier durchgeführte Querschnittsstudie evaluiert erstmalig, ob Schulen sich erfolgreich eigenständig – wie bildungspolitisch gefordert –, in sogenannte «problemlösende» Organisationseinheiten transformieren können, um ihren Unterricht im Rahmen der Schulentwicklung kontinuierlichen weiterzuentwickeln. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie stellen hierbei vor allem die Nachhaltigkeit von Schulentwicklung in Frage, da weder die Lehrpersonen noch Schulleitungsmitglieder an den evaluierten Berufsfachschulen der Meinung waren, dass Schulentwicklung den Unterricht und die beruflichen Fähigkeiten der Einzellehrperson überhaupt beeinflusst. Begründet liegt dieses Ergebnis u.a. in der von den Schulen vorgenommenen Implementierungsstrategie. So wird das Lehrerkollegium allgemein zu wenig in Entscheidungsprozesse involviert und beispielsweise nur unzureichend über den Zielerreichungrad und Maßnahmen abgeschlossener Schulentwicklungsprojekte informiert. 10.3726/978-3-653-06144-4 [2] e927e604-2954-4bf6-826b-d5ecb47c6555 b70636da-dc2d-4755-a37e-360db651c0bf 9783653061444 OAPEN-CH 2nd Call Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) 342 Bern 170379 Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) - OAPEN-CH open access