id |
oapen-20.500.12657-32113
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-321132021-11-12T16:34:34Z Tradition through Modernity: Postmodernism and the Nation-State in Folklore Scholarship Anttonen, Pertti J. postmodernism postmodern national identity folkloristics modern tradition Finland Finnish language Finns bic Book Industry Communication::A The arts::AC History of art / art & design styles::ACX History of art & design styles: from c 1900 -::ACXJ Art & design styles: from c 1960::ACXJ8 Art & design styles: Postmodernism bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JH Sociology & anthropology::JHM Anthropology::JHMC Social & cultural anthropology, ethnography bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government::JPF Political ideologies::JPFN Nationalism "In their study of social practices deemed traditional, scholars tend to use the concept and idea of tradition as an element of meaning in the practices under investigation. But just whose meaning is it? Is it a meaning generated by those who study tradition or those whose traditions are being studied? In both cases, particular criteria for traditionality are employed, whether these are explicated or not. Individuals and groups will no doubt continue to uphold their traditional practices or refer to their practices as traditional. While they are in no way obliged to explicate in analytical terms their criteria for traditionality, the same cannot be said for those who make the study of traditions their profession. In scholarly analysis, traditions need to be explained instead of used as explanations for apparent repetitions and replications or symbolic linking in social practice, values, history, and heritage politics. This book takes a closer look at ‘tradition’ and ‘folklore’ in order to conceptualize them within discourses on modernity and modernism. The first section discusses ‘modern’ and ‘traditional’ as modern concepts and the study of folklore as a modern trajectory. The underlying tenet here is that non-modernity cannot be represented without modern mediation, which therefore makes the representations of non-modernity epistemologically modern. The second section focuses on the nation-state of Finland and the nationalistic use of folk traditions in the discursive production of Finnish modernity and its Others. The insights are applicable worldwide in discussions on cultural representation. " 2016-12-31 23:55:55 2018-07-02 19:51:21 2020-04-01T13:58:34Z 2020-04-01T13:58:34Z 2005 book 617196 OCN: 1030816751 1235-1946 9789522228147;9789522228154 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32113 eng Studia Fennica Folkloristica application/pdf n/a 9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf https://doi.org/10.21435/sff.15 Finnish Literature Society / SKS 10.21435/sff.15 10.21435/sff.15 51db0f72-616d-4d86-b847-ade19380e08f f2ba3da1-e4a8-41c9-9a78-bf7b19984191 9789522228147;9789522228154 15 215 Helsinki Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation grant and SKS open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
"In their study of social practices deemed traditional, scholars tend to use the concept and idea of tradition as an element of meaning in the practices under investigation. But just whose meaning is it? Is it a meaning generated by those who study tradition or those whose traditions are being studied? In both cases, particular criteria for traditionality are employed, whether these are explicated or not. Individuals and groups will no doubt continue to uphold their traditional practices or refer to their practices as traditional. While they are in no way obliged to explicate in analytical terms their criteria for traditionality, the same cannot be said for those who make the study of traditions their profession. In scholarly analysis, traditions need to be explained instead of used as explanations for apparent repetitions and replications or symbolic linking in social practice, values, history, and heritage politics. This book takes a closer look at ‘tradition’ and ‘folklore’ in order to conceptualize them within discourses on modernity and modernism. The first section discusses ‘modern’ and ‘traditional’ as modern concepts and the study of folklore as a modern trajectory. The underlying tenet here is that non-modernity cannot be represented without modern mediation, which therefore makes the representations of non-modernity epistemologically modern. The second section focuses on the nation-state of Finland and the nationalistic use of folk traditions in the discursive production of Finnish modernity and its Others. The insights are applicable worldwide in discussions on cultural representation. "
|
title |
9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf
|
title_short |
9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf
|
title_full |
9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
9789522228147_tradition_through-REVISED.pdf
|
title_sort |
9789522228147_tradition_through-revised.pdf
|
publisher |
Finnish Literature Society / SKS
|
publishDate |
2016
|
url |
https://doi.org/10.21435/sff.15
|
_version_ |
1771297578426564608
|