| Περίληψη: | Several critics have been intrigued by the gap between late Victorian poetry and the more “modern” poetry of the 1920s. It is my contention that a close analysis
of the poetry and criticism written in the first decade of the 20th century and
until the end of the First World War – excluding war poetry – will be rewarding
if we want to acquire a greater understanding of the transition.
The book is not meant as a total overview of the intellectual climate in England
from Tennyson to Eliot. Rather, it describes the development that took
place within art and literature – especially poetry – as a reaction against the
positivist attitude. Early in the 19th century, science came to be taken as the
opposite of poetry because the Romanticists conceived of the lyrical poem as
the outlet of the poet’s feelings. That attitude was dominant during the rest of
the 19th century.
To many readers and critics, T.E.Hulme represents little more thasn a footnote.
He is vaguely known as one of the precursors of the far more interesting
T.S.Eliot, for which reason some lip-service may be paid to him, but his own
achievement is hardly ever referred to.
Hulme and the Imagists represent an intermediary stage between Tennyson
and Eliot, but they are more than mere stepping-stones. Besides being experimenting
poets, most of them are acute critics of art and literature, prescriptively
as well as descriptively. Hulme’s theories are sketchy, his presentation not
infrequently confusing, and his poetry mostly fragments. The following pages
attempt to analyse his oeuvre, a material hardly anybody has taken the trouble
to consider in its entirety, He understood that some form of theory is a useful
accompaniment of poetic practice, and, like his Imagist friends, he made the
poetic image the focus of his attention. The Imagists were opposed not only to
the monopoly of science, scientia scientium, which claimed to be able to decide
what truth and reality “really” were, but also to the “Tennysonianisms”, which,
they felt, had made poetry predictable and insipid.
This book attempts to get to grips with the watershed.
I owe Professor Lars Ole Sauerberg my heartfelt gratitude for his advice,
encouragement and patience during the process of writing this book.
|
|---|
