external_content.pdf

Amicus curiae participation in international courts is steadily growing since the late 1990 despite lack of clarity on the concept’s nature, function and utility in international dispute settlement. Does amicus curiae infuse international judicial proceedings with alternative views, including the pu...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2020
id oapen-20.500.12657-43984
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-439842021-01-25T13:50:36Z Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals Wiik, Astrid Law General bic Book Industry Communication::L Law::LA Jurisprudence & general issues Amicus curiae participation in international courts is steadily growing since the late 1990 despite lack of clarity on the concept’s nature, function and utility in international dispute settlement. Does amicus curiae infuse international judicial proceedings with alternative views, including the public interest in a case, as often advocated by NGOs? Does it increase the legitimacy and transparency of international dispute settlement, or the coherence of international law? Or is it an unhelpful impostor that impedes negotiated solutions and derails the proceedings at the expense of the parties to advance its own agenda? By way of an empirical-comparative analysis of the laws and practices of the ICJ, the ITLOS, the ECtHR, the IACtHR, the IACtHPR, WTO panels and the Appellate Body, and investment arbitration the dissertation examines the status quo of amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals to determine if the current amicus curiae practice is of added value to international proceedings and international dispute settlement in general. The dissertation shows that there is no common concept of international amicus curiae, but that amicus curiae before the international courts examined share a few characteristics. A proposed functional systematization highlights overlaps and diverging uses of the concept before international courts and helps scholars and practitioners to assess the opportunities and limits of the concept. Analysis of the concept’s current regulatory framework and its substantive effectiveness reveals a hesitation in particular by courts with a strong adversarial tradition to take into account the views of a non-party despite the positive experience with the concept in regional human rights courts. The dissertation concludes that neither the expectations nor the concerns attached to amicus curiae participation in international proceedings have materialized. It argues that the concept can contribute to improved decisions and decision-making in international dispute settlement if regulated and used properly. 2020-12-15T14:14:07Z 2020-12-15T14:14:07Z 2018 book 9783845275925 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/43984 eng application/pdf n/a external_content.pdf Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845275925 104697 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845275925 a828cf6c-76dd-4fdb-b400-ec5fba9459b8 b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 9783845275925 Knowledge Unlatched (KU) Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Knowledge Unlatched open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description Amicus curiae participation in international courts is steadily growing since the late 1990 despite lack of clarity on the concept’s nature, function and utility in international dispute settlement. Does amicus curiae infuse international judicial proceedings with alternative views, including the public interest in a case, as often advocated by NGOs? Does it increase the legitimacy and transparency of international dispute settlement, or the coherence of international law? Or is it an unhelpful impostor that impedes negotiated solutions and derails the proceedings at the expense of the parties to advance its own agenda? By way of an empirical-comparative analysis of the laws and practices of the ICJ, the ITLOS, the ECtHR, the IACtHR, the IACtHPR, WTO panels and the Appellate Body, and investment arbitration the dissertation examines the status quo of amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals to determine if the current amicus curiae practice is of added value to international proceedings and international dispute settlement in general. The dissertation shows that there is no common concept of international amicus curiae, but that amicus curiae before the international courts examined share a few characteristics. A proposed functional systematization highlights overlaps and diverging uses of the concept before international courts and helps scholars and practitioners to assess the opportunities and limits of the concept. Analysis of the concept’s current regulatory framework and its substantive effectiveness reveals a hesitation in particular by courts with a strong adversarial tradition to take into account the views of a non-party despite the positive experience with the concept in regional human rights courts. The dissertation concludes that neither the expectations nor the concerns attached to amicus curiae participation in international proceedings have materialized. It argues that the concept can contribute to improved decisions and decision-making in international dispute settlement if regulated and used properly.
title external_content.pdf
spellingShingle external_content.pdf
title_short external_content.pdf
title_full external_content.pdf
title_fullStr external_content.pdf
title_full_unstemmed external_content.pdf
title_sort external_content.pdf
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
publishDate 2020
_version_ 1771297449351053312