9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf

The political system of early socialist-era Mongolia, established by the first Constitution in 1924, can be interpreted as a vernacular version of the Soviet system, in which the formally supreme representative body, the State Great Khural (“assembly”), was sidelined by the standing Presidium of the...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Taylor & Francis 2021
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://www.routledge.com/Socialist-and-PostSocialist-Mongolia-Nation-Identity-and-Culture/Wickhamsmith-Marzluf/p/book/9780367350574
id oapen-20.500.12657-46057
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-460572021-01-13T02:19:02Z Chapter 2 Khural Democracy Sablin, Ivan Badagarov, Jargal Sodnomova, Irina culture, identity, Marzluf, Mongolia, nation, P, Phillip, post, post-socialist, Simon, socialist, Wickhamsmith bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JF Society & culture: general::JFS Social groups::JFSL Ethnic studies::JFSL3 Black & Asian studies The political system of early socialist-era Mongolia, established by the first Constitution in 1924, can be interpreted as a vernacular version of the Soviet system, in which the formally supreme representative body, the State Great Khural (“assembly”), was sidelined by the standing Presidium of the Small Khural and the Cabinet, and eclipsed by the non-constitutional party authorities. The establishment of this sham and nominal parliamentary system was a consequence of the Bolshevik new imperialism, the inclusion of the Mongolian People’s Republic into the informal Soviet empire, which occurred through both military control and structural adjustments under the supervision of the Communist International. The 1924 Mongolian Constitution, however, was not a mere copy of its Soviet 1918 and 1924 counterparts but a transimperial document. In its text and especially in the history of its making, it reflected the entangled imperial transformations of the Russian and Qing empires and featured both indigenous (Khalkha and Buryad-Mongol) agency and vernacular political discourses. Khural existed as a non-representative yet deliberative consultative assembly in 1914–1919, while Tsebeen Jamtsarano attempted to make a Mongolian khural one of the many world parliaments, even though his draft constitution was affected by the practices of revolutionary Russia. 2021-01-12T12:41:40Z 2021-01-12T12:41:40Z 2021 chapter https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/46057 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf https://www.routledge.com/Socialist-and-PostSocialist-Mongolia-Nation-Identity-and-Culture/Wickhamsmith-Marzluf/p/book/9780367350574 Taylor & Francis Socialist and Post–Socialist Mongolia Routledge 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 91fbe577-ca46-4bc2-84a6-a90d700a4a1f 51ab353e-7e24-4831-b528-d54333439d63 Routledge 30 Universität Heidelberg University of Heidelberg open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description The political system of early socialist-era Mongolia, established by the first Constitution in 1924, can be interpreted as a vernacular version of the Soviet system, in which the formally supreme representative body, the State Great Khural (“assembly”), was sidelined by the standing Presidium of the Small Khural and the Cabinet, and eclipsed by the non-constitutional party authorities. The establishment of this sham and nominal parliamentary system was a consequence of the Bolshevik new imperialism, the inclusion of the Mongolian People’s Republic into the informal Soviet empire, which occurred through both military control and structural adjustments under the supervision of the Communist International. The 1924 Mongolian Constitution, however, was not a mere copy of its Soviet 1918 and 1924 counterparts but a transimperial document. In its text and especially in the history of its making, it reflected the entangled imperial transformations of the Russian and Qing empires and featured both indigenous (Khalkha and Buryad-Mongol) agency and vernacular political discourses. Khural existed as a non-representative yet deliberative consultative assembly in 1914–1919, while Tsebeen Jamtsarano attempted to make a Mongolian khural one of the many world parliaments, even though his draft constitution was affected by the practices of revolutionary Russia.
title 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
spellingShingle 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
title_short 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
title_full 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
title_fullStr 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
title_sort 9780367350598_oachapter2.pdf
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2021
url https://www.routledge.com/Socialist-and-PostSocialist-Mongolia-Nation-Identity-and-Culture/Wickhamsmith-Marzluf/p/book/9780367350574
_version_ 1771297458494636032