Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf

What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disa...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Elsevier 2021
id oapen-20.500.12657-47721
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-477212022-05-04T08:21:30Z Ethics, conflict and medical treatment for children Wilkinson, Dominic Savulescu, Julian child; doctor; ;parents; disagreement; ethics; medical treatment; medical ethics bic Book Industry Communication::M Medicine::MB Medicine: general issues::MBD Medical profession::MBDC Medical ethics & professional conduct What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new “dissensus” framework for future cases of disagreement. 2021-04-06T11:41:04Z 2021-04-06T11:41:04Z 2018 book 9780702077838 9780702077821 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/47721 eng application/pdf Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf Elsevier 5640d047-147d-4edf-8f2d-8b6478ac0c38 d859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd 9780702077838 9780702077821 Wellcome 180 London WT106587/Z/14/Z; WT 104848/Z/14/Z Wellcome Trust Wellcome open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new “dissensus” framework for future cases of disagreement.
title Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf
spellingShingle Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf
title_short Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf
title_full Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf
title_fullStr Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf
title_full_unstemmed Bookshelf_NBK537987.pdf
title_sort bookshelf_nbk537987.pdf
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
_version_ 1771297416566276096