70392.pdf

This work presents a techno-economic parametric study of an innovative central receiver solar thermal power plant layout that applies the combined cycle (CC) as thermodynamic power cycle and a multi-tower solar field configuration together with open volumetric air receivers (OVARs). The topping gas...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: InTechOpen 2021
id oapen-20.500.12657-49302
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-493022021-11-23T14:01:15Z Chapter Techno-Economic Optimization and Benchmarking of a Solar-Only Powered Combined Cycle with High-Temperature TES Upstream the Gas Turbine Valentin, Benoît Zaversky, Fritz Les, Iñigo Berard, Flavien Brau, Jean-Florian Sánchez, Marcelino McGuire, Jonathon Siros, Frédéric concentrated solar power, solar combined cycle, multi-tower central receiver, open volumetric air receiver (OVAR) bic Book Industry Communication::T Technology, engineering, agriculture::TB Technology: general issues::TBC Engineering: general This work presents a techno-economic parametric study of an innovative central receiver solar thermal power plant layout that applies the combined cycle (CC) as thermodynamic power cycle and a multi-tower solar field configuration together with open volumetric air receivers (OVARs). The topping gas turbine (GT) is powered by an air–air heat exchanger (two heat exchanger trains in the case of reheat). In order to provide dispatchability, a high-temperature thermocline TES system is placed upstream the gas turbine. The aim is threefold, (i) investigating whether the multi-tower concept has a techno-economic advantage with respect to conventional single-tower central receiver plants, (ii) indicating the techno-economic optimum power plant configuration, and (iii) benchmarking the techno-economic optimum of the CC plant against that of a conventional single-cycle Rankine steam plant with the same receiver and TES technology. It is concluded that the multi-tower configuration has a techno-economic advantage with respect to the conventional single-tower arrangement above a total nominal solar power level of about 150 MW. However, the benchmarking of the CC against a Rankine single-cycle power plant layout shows that the CC configuration has despite its higher solar-to-electric conversion efficiency a higher LCOE. The gain in electricity yield is not enough to outweigh the higher investment costs of the more complex CC plant layout. 2021-06-02T10:11:45Z 2021-06-02T10:11:45Z 2019 chapter ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.90410_416 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49302 eng application/pdf n/a 70392.pdf InTechOpen 10.5772/intechopen.90410 10.5772/intechopen.90410 09f6769d-48ed-467d-b150-4cf2680656a1 H2020-LCE-2014-1 640905 open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description This work presents a techno-economic parametric study of an innovative central receiver solar thermal power plant layout that applies the combined cycle (CC) as thermodynamic power cycle and a multi-tower solar field configuration together with open volumetric air receivers (OVARs). The topping gas turbine (GT) is powered by an air–air heat exchanger (two heat exchanger trains in the case of reheat). In order to provide dispatchability, a high-temperature thermocline TES system is placed upstream the gas turbine. The aim is threefold, (i) investigating whether the multi-tower concept has a techno-economic advantage with respect to conventional single-tower central receiver plants, (ii) indicating the techno-economic optimum power plant configuration, and (iii) benchmarking the techno-economic optimum of the CC plant against that of a conventional single-cycle Rankine steam plant with the same receiver and TES technology. It is concluded that the multi-tower configuration has a techno-economic advantage with respect to the conventional single-tower arrangement above a total nominal solar power level of about 150 MW. However, the benchmarking of the CC against a Rankine single-cycle power plant layout shows that the CC configuration has despite its higher solar-to-electric conversion efficiency a higher LCOE. The gain in electricity yield is not enough to outweigh the higher investment costs of the more complex CC plant layout.
title 70392.pdf
spellingShingle 70392.pdf
title_short 70392.pdf
title_full 70392.pdf
title_fullStr 70392.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 70392.pdf
title_sort 70392.pdf
publisher InTechOpen
publishDate 2021
_version_ 1771297507264954368