| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-502282021-07-26T13:20:30Z Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie von der Becke, Tanja Argument omission polysemy verb valency bic Book Industry Communication::C Language::CF linguistics bic Book Industry Communication::C Language::CF linguistics::CFG Semantics, discourse analysis, etc::CFGA Semantics & pragmatics bic Book Industry Communication::C Language::CF linguistics::CFK Grammar, syntax & morphology Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. 2021-07-26T12:27:39Z 2021-07-26T12:27:39Z 2021 book ONIX_20210726_9783110726268_31 1612-8702 9783110726268 9783110726831 9783110726374 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50228 ger Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 9783110726268.pdf https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110726268/html De Gruyter De Gruyter 10.1515/9783110726268 Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. 10.1515/9783110726268 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 9783110726268 9783110726831 9783110726374 De Gruyter 91 355 Berlin/Boston open access
|
