26382.pdf

Dositej Obradović’s Život i priključenija is generally considered the symbolic herald of modern Serbian literature, a paradigmatic text which affected many later writers, including Gerasim Zelić. The paper compares Dositej’s work and Zelić’s Žitije focusing on three levels: firstly, it tracks the co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Language:ita
Published: Firenze University Press 2022
Online Access:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-6453-979-9_8
id oapen-20.500.12657-55973
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-559732022-06-02T03:20:17Z Chapter Due autobiografie a confronto: Život i priključenija di Dositej Obradović e Žitije di Gerasim Zelić Leto, Maria Rita Serbian literature autobiography travel writing Dositej Obradović Gerasim Zelić Dositej Obradović’s Život i priključenija is generally considered the symbolic herald of modern Serbian literature, a paradigmatic text which affected many later writers, including Gerasim Zelić. The paper compares Dositej’s work and Zelić’s Žitije focusing on three levels: firstly, it tracks the common topoi and the distinctive characteristics of the two texts; secondly, it discusses the ways in which Zelić reinterprets Dositej’s model, especially with respect to autobiography and travelogue; finally, it elaborates on the different yet cognate notion of authorship the two texts propose. 2022-06-01T12:09:53Z 2022-06-01T12:09:53Z 2019 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788864539799_156 2612-7679 9788864539799 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55973 ita Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 26382.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-6453-979-9_8 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-6453-979-9.07 10.36253/978-88-6453-979-9.07 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788864539799 44 17 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language ita
description Dositej Obradović’s Život i priključenija is generally considered the symbolic herald of modern Serbian literature, a paradigmatic text which affected many later writers, including Gerasim Zelić. The paper compares Dositej’s work and Zelić’s Žitije focusing on three levels: firstly, it tracks the common topoi and the distinctive characteristics of the two texts; secondly, it discusses the ways in which Zelić reinterprets Dositej’s model, especially with respect to autobiography and travelogue; finally, it elaborates on the different yet cognate notion of authorship the two texts propose.
title 26382.pdf
spellingShingle 26382.pdf
title_short 26382.pdf
title_full 26382.pdf
title_fullStr 26382.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 26382.pdf
title_sort 26382.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press
publishDate 2022
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-6453-979-9_8
_version_ 1771297580715606016