| id |
oapen-20.500.12657-56181
|
| record_format |
dspace
|
| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-561812022-06-02T03:23:20Z Chapter Il Boccaccio di Baldassar Castiglione: la duplice immagine del Certaldese nelle pagine del Cortegiano Palma, Flavia Boccaccio Cortegiano literary language joke. Giovanni Boccaccio is quoted several times in Castiglione’s Cortegiano, but all these mentions are inserted in two specific contexts: on the one hand, the debate on literary language, developed in the letter of dedication to don Michel De Silva and in the first book; on the other hand, the definition of the joke in book II. Starting from these premises, this essay analyses the meanings of Boccaccio’s presence in the Cortegiano. It shows that Castiglione’s treatise provides two different and concurrent representations of the author of the Decameron: a positive one, connected to the ‘questione della lingua’, that offers Boccaccio as a promoter of the usage (‘uso’); a critical one, deriving from the theory of the ‘facezia’, that makes Boccaccio a challenging and challenged model. 2022-06-01T12:15:43Z 2022-06-01T12:15:43Z 2020 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855182362_364 2704-5919 9788855182362 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56181 ita Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 15738.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-236-2_13 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-236-2.14 10.36253/978-88-5518-236-2.14 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855182362 219 15 Florence open access
|
| institution |
OAPEN
|
| collection |
DSpace
|
| language |
ita
|
| description |
Giovanni Boccaccio is quoted several times in Castiglione’s Cortegiano, but all these mentions are inserted in two specific contexts: on the one hand, the debate on literary language, developed in the letter of dedication to don Michel De Silva and in the first book; on the other hand, the definition of the joke in book II. Starting from these premises, this essay analyses the meanings of Boccaccio’s presence in the Cortegiano. It shows that Castiglione’s treatise provides two different and concurrent representations of the author of the Decameron: a positive one, connected to the ‘questione della lingua’, that offers Boccaccio as a promoter of the usage (‘uso’); a critical one, deriving from the theory of the ‘facezia’, that makes Boccaccio a challenging and challenged model.
|
| title |
15738.pdf
|
| spellingShingle |
15738.pdf
|
| title_short |
15738.pdf
|
| title_full |
15738.pdf
|
| title_fullStr |
15738.pdf
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
15738.pdf
|
| title_sort |
15738.pdf
|
| publisher |
Firenze University Press
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-236-2_13
|
| _version_ |
1771297557263155200
|
