| id |
oapen-20.500.12657-56246
|
| record_format |
dspace
|
| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-562462022-06-02T03:24:13Z Chapter L’amorose furie d’Orlando de Giacinto Andrea Cicognini y el teatro de abolengo ariostesco de Lope de Vega: una cuestión crítica pendiente TRAMBAIOLI, Marcella Giacinto Andrea Cicognini L'amorose furie d'Orlando Lope de Vega In order to highlight the intertextual game that Giacinto Andrea Cicognini creates in it L’amorose furie d’Orlando with Angélica en el Catay by Lope de Vega, a hypothesis vented but not demonstrated by Gobbi in an ancient critical essay, it is necessary to read and reread the two comedies without losing sight of the octaves of Ariosto with a meticulousness that, until now, no one had believed necessary to put in place, perhaps because in both cases we are not faced with absolute masterpieces. In any case, if it is true that certain images and phrases can fall into the category of literary interdiscursiveness, which goes beyond the two plays analyzed, the fact remains that the numerous similarities identified cannot be the result of chance. 2022-06-01T12:17:15Z 2022-06-01T12:17:15Z 2020 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855181501_429 2704-5919 9788855181501 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56246 ita Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 14596.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-150-1_11 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-150-1.11 10.36253/978-88-5518-150-1.11 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855181501 209 19 Florence open access
|
| institution |
OAPEN
|
| collection |
DSpace
|
| language |
ita
|
| description |
In order to highlight the intertextual game that Giacinto Andrea Cicognini creates in it L’amorose furie d’Orlando with Angélica en el Catay by Lope de Vega, a hypothesis vented but not demonstrated by Gobbi in an ancient critical essay, it is necessary to read and reread the two comedies without losing sight of the octaves of Ariosto with a meticulousness that, until now, no one had believed necessary to put in place, perhaps because in both cases we are not faced with absolute masterpieces. In any case, if it is true that certain images and phrases can fall into the category of literary interdiscursiveness, which goes beyond the two plays analyzed, the fact remains that the numerous similarities identified cannot be the result of chance.
|
| title |
14596.pdf
|
| spellingShingle |
14596.pdf
|
| title_short |
14596.pdf
|
| title_full |
14596.pdf
|
| title_fullStr |
14596.pdf
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
14596.pdf
|
| title_sort |
14596.pdf
|
| publisher |
Firenze University Press
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-150-1_11
|
| _version_ |
1771297519513370624
|
