16980.pdf

Logical abilities are a ubiquitous ingredient in all those contexts that take into account soft skills, argumentative skills or critical thinking. However, the relationship between logical models and the enhancement of these abilities is rarely explicitly considered. Two aspects of the issue are par...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Firenze University Press 2022
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-304-8_9
id oapen-20.500.12657-56334
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-563342022-06-02T03:25:40Z Chapter Measuring logical competences and soft skills when enrolling in a university degree course Bertaccini, Bruno Bruni, Riccardo Crescenzi, Federico DONATI, BEATRICE studentes' logical abilities IRT test equating Logical abilities are a ubiquitous ingredient in all those contexts that take into account soft skills, argumentative skills or critical thinking. However, the relationship between logical models and the enhancement of these abilities is rarely explicitly considered. Two aspects of the issue are particularly critical in our opinion, namely: (i) the lack of statistically relevant data concerning these competences; (ii) the absence of reliable indices that might be used to measure and detect the possession of abilities underlying the above-mentioned soft skills. This paper aims to address both aspects of this topic by presenting the results of a research we conducted in the period October – December 2020 on students enrolled in various degree courses at the University of Florence. To the best of our knowledge, to date this is the largest available database on the subject in the Italian University System. It has been obtained by a three-stage initiative. We started from an “entrance” examination for assessing the students' initial abilities. This test comprised ten questions, each of which was centered on a specific reasoning construct. The results we have collected show that there is a widespread lack of understanding of basic patterns that are common in the everyday way of arguing. Students then underwent a short training course, using formal logic techniques in order to strengthen their abilities, and afterwards took an “exit” examination, replicating the structure and the questions difficulty of the entrance one in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the course. Results show that the training was beneficial. 2022-06-01T12:19:42Z 2022-06-01T12:19:42Z 2021 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855183048_519 2704-5846 9788855183048 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56334 eng Proceedings e report application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 16980.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-304-8_9 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-304-8.09 10.36253/978-88-5518-304-8.09 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855183048 127 6 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description Logical abilities are a ubiquitous ingredient in all those contexts that take into account soft skills, argumentative skills or critical thinking. However, the relationship between logical models and the enhancement of these abilities is rarely explicitly considered. Two aspects of the issue are particularly critical in our opinion, namely: (i) the lack of statistically relevant data concerning these competences; (ii) the absence of reliable indices that might be used to measure and detect the possession of abilities underlying the above-mentioned soft skills. This paper aims to address both aspects of this topic by presenting the results of a research we conducted in the period October – December 2020 on students enrolled in various degree courses at the University of Florence. To the best of our knowledge, to date this is the largest available database on the subject in the Italian University System. It has been obtained by a three-stage initiative. We started from an “entrance” examination for assessing the students' initial abilities. This test comprised ten questions, each of which was centered on a specific reasoning construct. The results we have collected show that there is a widespread lack of understanding of basic patterns that are common in the everyday way of arguing. Students then underwent a short training course, using formal logic techniques in order to strengthen their abilities, and afterwards took an “exit” examination, replicating the structure and the questions difficulty of the entrance one in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the course. Results show that the training was beneficial.
title 16980.pdf
spellingShingle 16980.pdf
title_short 16980.pdf
title_full 16980.pdf
title_fullStr 16980.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 16980.pdf
title_sort 16980.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press
publishDate 2022
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-304-8_9
_version_ 1771297614192443392