id |
oapen-20.500.12657-56466
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-564662022-06-02T03:27:39Z Chapter Il Laurenziano Pluteo 42, 3 e la tradizione caratterizzante del Decameron Monaco, Giulia Boccaccio Decameron tradition witnesses copyists The aim of this article is to illustrate the most relevant results of the philological and textual analysis that I accomplished on a witness of Boccaccio’s Decameron, MS. Firenze, Bibl. Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 42, 3. The work consisted in an integral collation, based on two Giornate and some loci critici, between Plut. 42, 3 and the most authoritative tradition of Decameron (MSS. Berlin, Staatsbibl., Ham. 90, Paris, Bibl. nationale de France, It. 482 and Firenze, Bibl. Med. Laur., Plut. 42, 1). On one hand, the purpose of this work is to demonstrate that the text transmitted by Plut. 42, 3 is contaminated and altered by errors and innovations, therefore unusable for a new critical edition of the work; on the other hand, it leads us to an investigation into the existence of a «characterizing tradition» of Decameron. 2022-06-01T12:25:06Z 2022-06-01T12:25:06Z 2021 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855185103_651 2704-5919 9788855185103 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56466 ita Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 29688.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-510-3_6 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-510-3.06 10.36253/978-88-5518-510-3.06 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855185103 236 12 Florence open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
ita
|
description |
The aim of this article is to illustrate the most relevant results of the philological and textual analysis that I accomplished on a witness of Boccaccio’s Decameron, MS. Firenze, Bibl. Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 42, 3. The work consisted in an integral collation, based on two Giornate and some loci critici, between Plut. 42, 3 and the most authoritative tradition of Decameron (MSS. Berlin, Staatsbibl., Ham. 90, Paris, Bibl. nationale de France, It. 482 and Firenze, Bibl. Med. Laur., Plut. 42, 1). On one hand, the purpose of this work is to demonstrate that the text transmitted by Plut. 42, 3 is contaminated and altered by errors and innovations, therefore unusable for a new critical edition of the work; on the other hand, it leads us to an investigation into the existence of a «characterizing tradition» of Decameron.
|
title |
29688.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
29688.pdf
|
title_short |
29688.pdf
|
title_full |
29688.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
29688.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
29688.pdf
|
title_sort |
29688.pdf
|
publisher |
Firenze University Press
|
publishDate |
2022
|
url |
https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-510-3_6
|
_version_ |
1771297535345819648
|