id |
oapen-20.500.12657-56487
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-564872022-06-02T03:28:01Z Chapter Evolución de los criterios ecdóticos en las ediciones modernas del teatro de Shakespeare Tronch Pérez, Jesús ecdotics Shakespeare conservative editing eclectic editing copy-text Editorial criteria in critical editions of Shakespeare’s plays have evolved from a 18th-century arbitrary eclecticism into one restricted by the editor’s knowledge of the nature and transmission of the early texts, a knowledge developed by the 20th-century New Bibliography that specially informs paleographical and bibliographical criteria. Roughly from the 21st century, these criteria have evolved into a conservatism influenced by a social view of texts, which stands on a par with the primordial criterion of reconstructing the text intended by the author. This textualism is nourished by a skepticism about the certainty the New Bibliography inspired in what editors know about the texts’ transmission. 2022-06-01T12:25:38Z 2022-06-01T12:25:38Z 2021 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855182249_672 2704-5919 9788855182249 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56487 spa Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 15375.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-224-9_7 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-224-9.07 10.36253/978-88-5518-224-9.07 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855182249 218 27 Florence open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
spa
|
description |
Editorial criteria in critical editions of Shakespeare’s plays have evolved from a 18th-century arbitrary eclecticism into one restricted by the editor’s knowledge of the nature and transmission of the early texts, a knowledge developed by the 20th-century New Bibliography that specially informs paleographical and bibliographical criteria. Roughly from the 21st century, these criteria have evolved into a conservatism influenced by a social view of texts, which stands on a par with the primordial criterion of reconstructing the text intended by the author. This textualism is nourished by a skepticism about the certainty the New Bibliography inspired in what editors know about the texts’ transmission.
|
title |
15375.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
15375.pdf
|
title_short |
15375.pdf
|
title_full |
15375.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
15375.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
15375.pdf
|
title_sort |
15375.pdf
|
publisher |
Firenze University Press
|
publishDate |
2022
|
url |
https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-224-9_7
|
_version_ |
1771297452382486528
|