25966.pdf

The paper focuses on the relationship between the Fascist regime and the administrative justice. Once identified in the “invention” of exclusive jurisdiction (over individual matters) a “revolutionary” act of the early Fascism, the paper faces the problem of the administrative litigation over public...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:ita
Έκδοση: Firenze University Press 2022
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-455-7_4
id oapen-20.500.12657-56534
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-565342022-06-02T03:29:04Z Chapter Legge e giustizia amministrativa durante il ventennio fascista MERUSI, FABIO Fascism Administrative justice Public debt Limitations of the appeal against administrative acts Excess of power Laws-measure Theft of jurisdiction The paper focuses on the relationship between the Fascist regime and the administrative justice. Once identified in the “invention” of exclusive jurisdiction (over individual matters) a “revolutionary” act of the early Fascism, the paper faces the problem of the administrative litigation over public debt. The issue is treated starting from the transformation of the jurisdiction of merit in the matter of public debt into exclusive jurisdiction: a special attention is paid to the two opposite theses of the “left-wing fascism” and the Italian Constitutional Court. Subsequently, the reflection shifts to the Fascist laws that have limited or excluded since 1923 the appeal against certain administrative acts, also referring to the reactions of the doctrine of the time. A particular case concerns the vice of excess of power which, in the Fascist period, was rationalized and also took on a different meaning from the original one foreseen by the law of 1889. After the fall of Fascism, a final look is turned to the two elusive techniques of the appeal to the administrative judge represented by the laws-measure and the so called “theft of jurisdiction” 2022-06-01T12:27:32Z 2022-06-01T12:27:32Z 2021 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855184557_718 2704-5919 9788855184557 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56534 ita Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 25966.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-455-7_4 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-455-7.04 10.36253/978-88-5518-455-7.04 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855184557 227 19 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language ita
description The paper focuses on the relationship between the Fascist regime and the administrative justice. Once identified in the “invention” of exclusive jurisdiction (over individual matters) a “revolutionary” act of the early Fascism, the paper faces the problem of the administrative litigation over public debt. The issue is treated starting from the transformation of the jurisdiction of merit in the matter of public debt into exclusive jurisdiction: a special attention is paid to the two opposite theses of the “left-wing fascism” and the Italian Constitutional Court. Subsequently, the reflection shifts to the Fascist laws that have limited or excluded since 1923 the appeal against certain administrative acts, also referring to the reactions of the doctrine of the time. A particular case concerns the vice of excess of power which, in the Fascist period, was rationalized and also took on a different meaning from the original one foreseen by the law of 1889. After the fall of Fascism, a final look is turned to the two elusive techniques of the appeal to the administrative judge represented by the laws-measure and the so called “theft of jurisdiction”
title 25966.pdf
spellingShingle 25966.pdf
title_short 25966.pdf
title_full 25966.pdf
title_fullStr 25966.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 25966.pdf
title_sort 25966.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press
publishDate 2022
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-455-7_4
_version_ 1771297382841974784