20495.pdf

Part of public opinion believes that Article 3 of the Italian Constitution should be reformulated by eliminating the word "race", because of its historical meanings. Some jurists disagree with this opinion believing that this presence is still justified by the need to fight possible discri...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:ita
Έκδοση: Firenze University Press 2022
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-364-2_6
id oapen-20.500.12657-56580
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-565802022-06-02T03:29:41Z Chapter Le risorse documentarie dell’Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell’Informazione Giuridica del CNR per un’analisi di termini giuridici rilevanti: il caso di studio della parola «razza» Cammelli, Antonio Fioravanti, Chiara Romano, Francesco race discrimination minority rights language of law terminological resources Part of public opinion believes that Article 3 of the Italian Constitution should be reformulated by eliminating the word "race", because of its historical meanings. Some jurists disagree with this opinion believing that this presence is still justified by the need to fight possible discrimination or to protect minority rights. Biologists have also entered the debate, asserting that this word cannot be used to refer to human races because there’s no scientific basis for race. Cleared up any doubt about the origin of the term and the use that should be made of it, to contribute to today's debate, we have verified how this term was used in the language of law, using the terminological resources of the Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems (IGSG) – CNR databases. 2022-06-01T12:28:58Z 2022-06-01T12:28:58Z 2021 chapter ONIX_20220601_9788855183642_764 2704-5846 9788855183642 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56580 ita Proceedings e report application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 20495.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-364-2_6 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-364-2.06 10.36253/978-88-5518-364-2.06 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855183642 129 12 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language ita
description Part of public opinion believes that Article 3 of the Italian Constitution should be reformulated by eliminating the word "race", because of its historical meanings. Some jurists disagree with this opinion believing that this presence is still justified by the need to fight possible discrimination or to protect minority rights. Biologists have also entered the debate, asserting that this word cannot be used to refer to human races because there’s no scientific basis for race. Cleared up any doubt about the origin of the term and the use that should be made of it, to contribute to today's debate, we have verified how this term was used in the language of law, using the terminological resources of the Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems (IGSG) – CNR databases.
title 20495.pdf
spellingShingle 20495.pdf
title_short 20495.pdf
title_full 20495.pdf
title_fullStr 20495.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 20495.pdf
title_sort 20495.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press
publishDate 2022
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-364-2_6
_version_ 1771297508891295744