id |
oapen-20.500.12657-57081
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-570812023-07-11T12:27:54Z Chapter 3 Persuasive technologies and the right to mental liberty Ligthart, Sjors Meynen, Gerben Thomas, Douglas persuasive technologies; mental liberty; rehabilitation; criminal offenders bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JK Social services & welfare, criminology::JKV Crime & criminology::JKVQ Offenders::JKVQ1 Rehabilitation of offenders The outline of this chapter is as follows. In section 2 we provide a further definition of PTs, and present some possibilities that PTs offer for the smart correctional rehabilitation of criminal offenders. Next, in section 3, we briefly discuss the right to mental liberty and the extent to which this right is guaranteed by existing European human rights. In section 4, we discuss three considerations that should be relevant in specifying human rights protection against smart rehabilitation. Subsequently, in section 5 we explore whether the use of PTs in the context of smart rehabilitation would infringe an appropriately specified legal right to mental liberty. We suggest that, in this context, it might be difficult to identify compelling distinctions between novel forms of smart rehabilitation and more traditional criminal legal interventions, such as the imposition of a prison sentence or a psychological treatment program. 2022-06-22T10:42:59Z 2022-06-22T10:42:59Z 2022 chapter https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57081 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf Cambridge University Press The Cambridge Handbook of Information Technology, Life Sciences and Human Rights 7607a2d0-47af-490f-9d2a-8c9340266f8a 81f4ec6a-a8ce-4bca-9c72-895f6cbd3beb 178e65b9-dd53-4922-b85c-0aaa74fce079 Wellcome Trust European Research Council (ERC) Wellcome 23 819757 ProtMind Protecting Minds H2020 European Research Council H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
The outline of this chapter is as follows. In section 2 we provide a further definition of
PTs, and present some possibilities that PTs offer for the smart correctional rehabilitation of
criminal offenders. Next, in section 3, we briefly discuss the right to mental liberty and the
extent to which this right is guaranteed by existing European human rights. In section 4, we
discuss three considerations that should be relevant in specifying human rights protection
against smart rehabilitation. Subsequently, in section 5 we explore whether the use of PTs in
the context of smart rehabilitation would infringe an appropriately specified legal right to
mental liberty. We suggest that, in this context, it might be difficult to identify compelling
distinctions between novel forms of smart rehabilitation and more traditional criminal legal
interventions, such as the imposition of a prison sentence or a psychological treatment
program.
|
title |
Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf
|
title_short |
Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf
|
title_full |
Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Persuasive technologies AAM.pdf
|
title_sort |
persuasive technologies aam.pdf
|
publisher |
Cambridge University Press
|
publishDate |
2022
|
_version_ |
1799945237176516608
|