9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf

The issue of (dis)continuity in the pre- and post-1989 situation has been a contentious one in the Czech public debate and intensely discussed particularly in the early 2010s. In the field of theatre, the question of (dis-)continuity has not been raised yet, though its answering might fundamentally...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Taylor & Francis 2022
id oapen-20.500.12657-57169
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-571692022-07-02T02:54:35Z Chapter 9 Crisis? Kunderová, Radka Culture, 1989 bic Book Industry Communication::A The arts::AN Theatre studies bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government::JPB Comparative politics bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government::JPQ Central government::JPQB Central government policies The issue of (dis)continuity in the pre- and post-1989 situation has been a contentious one in the Czech public debate and intensely discussed particularly in the early 2010s. In the field of theatre, the question of (dis-)continuity has not been raised yet, though its answering might fundamentally shape future interpretations of the three post-1989 decades in Czech theatre. In general terms, Czech theatre historiography has devoted only minor attention to the issue of how the 1989 political events influenced theatre and its social relevance. In his text, Libor Vodicka conceptualises the situation of Czech theatre after 1989 as a crisis of theatre . His evaluation of the early 1990s strikes one as especially negative coming after a laudatory description of the preceding phase. Vodicka sees one factor contributing to the crisis of theatre in the chaos and inconsistency and decrease of subsidies coming from state institutions that, purportedly, significantly interfered with theatres operation. 2022-07-01T09:12:23Z 2022-07-01T09:12:23Z 2021 chapter 9780367266103 9780367676667 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57169 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf Taylor & Francis Theatre Institutions in Crisis Routledge 10.4324/9780429294167-13 10.4324/9780429294167-13 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 6a3023b3-4819-487e-9719-018e5718eb8d 9780367266103 9780367676667 Routledge 11 open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description The issue of (dis)continuity in the pre- and post-1989 situation has been a contentious one in the Czech public debate and intensely discussed particularly in the early 2010s. In the field of theatre, the question of (dis-)continuity has not been raised yet, though its answering might fundamentally shape future interpretations of the three post-1989 decades in Czech theatre. In general terms, Czech theatre historiography has devoted only minor attention to the issue of how the 1989 political events influenced theatre and its social relevance. In his text, Libor Vodicka conceptualises the situation of Czech theatre after 1989 as a crisis of theatre . His evaluation of the early 1990s strikes one as especially negative coming after a laudatory description of the preceding phase. Vodicka sees one factor contributing to the crisis of theatre in the chaos and inconsistency and decrease of subsidies coming from state institutions that, purportedly, significantly interfered with theatres operation.
title 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
spellingShingle 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
title_short 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
title_full 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
title_fullStr 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
title_sort 9780429294167_10.4324_9780429294167-13.pdf
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2022
_version_ 1771297521756274688