id |
oapen-20.500.12657-57674
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-576742022-11-22T00:00:00Z Chapter (When) Is Adblocking Wrong? Douglas, Thomas Adblocking, Piracy, Theft, Intellectual Property, Complicity, Extortion, Free-Riding bic Book Industry Communication::L Law::LN Laws of Specific jurisdictions::LNR Intellectual property law In this chapter, I examine three deontological objections to adblocking: the objection from property (according to which adblocking involves accessing another’s property without satisfying the conditions placed on such access by the owner), the objection from complicity (according to which, by blocking ads, consumers become complicit in wrongdoing of adblocking software providers), and the objection from freeriding (according to which adblocking consumers free-ride on other consumers who allow ads to be served). I argue that, though these objections plausibly establish the moral impermissibility of some instances of adblocking, they do not, even collectively, establish a blanket moral prohibition on adblocking, as it is currently done. 2022-08-01T09:18:07Z 2022-08-01T09:18:07Z 2021 chapter 9780198857815 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57674 eng application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf Oxford University Press The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics b9501915-cdee-4f2a-8030-9c0b187854b2 5aef9031-6c4d-4408-9923-c5a99ee6524c 178e65b9-dd53-4922-b85c-0aaa74fce079 9780198857815 European Research Council (ERC) 21 Oxford 819757 ProtMind H2020 European Research Council H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
In this chapter, I examine three deontological objections to adblocking: the objection from property (according to which adblocking involves accessing another’s property without satisfying the conditions
placed on such access by the owner), the objection from complicity (according to which, by blocking ads, consumers become complicit in wrongdoing of adblocking software providers), and the objection from freeriding (according to which adblocking consumers free-ride on other consumers who allow ads to be served). I argue that, though these objections plausibly establish the moral impermissibility of some instances of adblocking, they do not, even collectively, establish a blanket moral prohibition on adblocking, as it is currently done.
|
title |
Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf
|
title_short |
Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf
|
title_full |
Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Is Adblocking Wrongful Douglas Accepted manuscript.pdf
|
title_sort |
is adblocking wrongful douglas accepted manuscript.pdf
|
publisher |
Oxford University Press
|
publishDate |
2022
|
_version_ |
1771297500535193600
|