id |
oapen-20.500.12657-57846
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-578462022-08-09T03:03:35Z Chapter 12 Bridging the Divide Kind, Amy experiential perspectives, epistemic arrogance bic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HP Philosophy::HPK Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge bic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HP Philosophy::HPM Philosophy of mind Ch. 12 Can one have imaginative access to experiential perspectives vastly different from one s own? Can one successfully imagine what it s like to live a life very different from one s own? These questions are particularly pressing in contemporary society as we try to bridge racial, ethnic, and gender divides. Yet philosophers have often expressed considerable pessimism in this regard. It is often thought that the gulf between vastly different experiential perspectives cannot be bridged. This chapter explores the case for this pessimism. Though the case is often less implicit, the chapter identifies two different arguments that can be found in the literature: the Epistemic Arrogance argument and the Too Big a Gulf argument. Both arguments are found to be considerably weaker than is usually thought. But even if the case for pessimism is unsuccessful, discussion of that case suggests the importance of treading carefully in taking up imaginative explorations of different experiential perspectives. The chapter thus concludes with a cautionary note in this regard. 2022-08-08T12:43:49Z 2022-08-08T12:43:49Z 2021 chapter 9780367480561 9781032018935 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57846 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf Taylor & Francis Epistemic Uses of Imagination Routledge 10.4324/9781003041979-17 10.4324/9781003041979-17 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb a96255d3-25ea-4ce3-bfad-49f673d26df8 9780367480561 9781032018935 Routledge 24 open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
Ch. 12 Can one have imaginative access to experiential perspectives vastly different from one s own? Can one successfully imagine what it s like to live a life very different from one s own? These questions are particularly pressing in contemporary society as we try to bridge racial, ethnic, and gender divides. Yet philosophers have often expressed considerable pessimism in this regard. It is often thought that the gulf between vastly different experiential perspectives cannot be bridged. This chapter explores the case for this pessimism. Though the case is often less implicit, the chapter identifies two different arguments that can be found in the literature: the Epistemic Arrogance argument and the Too Big a Gulf argument. Both arguments are found to be considerably weaker than is usually thought. But even if the case for pessimism is unsuccessful, discussion of that case suggests the importance of treading carefully in taking up imaginative explorations of different experiential perspectives. The chapter thus concludes with a cautionary note in this regard.
|
title |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
title_short |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
title_full |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
title_sort |
9781003041979_10.4324_9781003041979-17.pdf
|
publisher |
Taylor & Francis
|
publishDate |
2022
|
_version_ |
1771297466032848896
|