id |
oapen-20.500.12657-59044
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-590442022-10-26T03:33:40Z Kaanon ja marginaali Hämäläinen, Niina Tarkka, Lotte Maria national culture; cultural canons; research history; cultural heritage; folklore; literature bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JF Society & culture: general::JFH Popular beliefs & controversial knowledge::JFHF Folklore, myths & legends bic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HB History bic Book Industry Communication::D Literature & literary studies Why the Kalevala and not the Kanteletar? The Kalevala Society’s 101st Yearbook maps the processes of canonizing and marginalizing in traditions, cultural heritage and literature by focusing on the fringes of cultural ideals and norms. How and using which criteria have researchers, artists and materials of cultural production been lifted up or pushed aside? What kind of nations would have emerged if writing the nation had rested on the alternatives: the marginal rather than the canonical genres? A look into the blind spots and fringes of culture and research reveals the endless movement in and between hierarchically positioned spheres of culture. Listening to margins changes not only the canon but also the idea of canon. 2022-10-25T09:14:38Z 2022-10-25T09:14:38Z 2022 book 9789518584561 9789518584578 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59044 fin Kalevalaseuran vuosikirja application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf https://doi.org/10.21435/ksvk.101 Finnish Literature Society / SKS 10.21435/ksvk.101 10.21435/ksvk.101 51db0f72-616d-4d86-b847-ade19380e08f 9789518584561 9789518584578 2 353 Helsinki open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
fin
|
description |
Why the Kalevala and not the Kanteletar? The Kalevala Society’s 101st Yearbook maps the processes of canonizing and marginalizing in traditions, cultural heritage and literature by focusing on the fringes of cultural ideals and norms. How and using which criteria have researchers, artists and materials of cultural production been lifted up or pushed aside? What kind of nations would have emerged if writing the nation had rested on the alternatives: the marginal rather than the canonical genres? A look into the blind spots and fringes of culture and research reveals the endless movement in and between hierarchically positioned spheres of culture. Listening to margins changes not only the canon but also the idea of canon.
|
title |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
title_short |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
title_full |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
title_sort |
kaanon-ja-marginaali.pdf
|
publisher |
Finnish Literature Society / SKS
|
publishDate |
2022
|
url |
https://doi.org/10.21435/ksvk.101
|
_version_ |
1771297449323790336
|