pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf

Rapid economic growth is often a disruptive social process threatening the social relations and ideologies of incumbent regimes. Yet far from acting defensively, the Chinese Communist Party has lead a major social and economic transformation over forty years, without yet encountering fundamental cha...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: LSE Press 2022
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.ppc
id oapen-20.500.12657-59128
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-591282022-11-02T03:08:56Z Pension Policy and Governmentality in China Wang, Yan pension policy; government bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government::JPA Political science & theory Rapid economic growth is often a disruptive social process threatening the social relations and ideologies of incumbent regimes. Yet far from acting defensively, the Chinese Communist Party has lead a major social and economic transformation over forty years, without yet encountering fundamental challenges subverting its rule. A key question for political sociology is thus - how have the logics of China’s governmentality been able to help maintain compliance from the governed while acting so radically to advance the state’s growth priorities? This book explores the issue by analysing the detailed trajectories, rationale, and effects of China’s pension reforms. It uses strong methods, including institutional analysis of resource allocation in the multiple pension schemes and programmes, and quantitative text analysis of the knowledge construction in official discourse along with the reforms. Causal identification estimates the effects of key policy instruments on public opinion about pension responsibility and political trust. Moving beyond the pension issues, the analysis discusses with qualitative evidence why falsified compliance might exist in China’s society and the mechanisms that may lie behind it. Where active counter-conduct (such as resistance) is confined, individuals may choose cognitive rebellion and falsify their public compliance. The Chinese state’s strategy to generate public compliance is hybrid, organic, and dynamic. The state rules society by its customised governance design and constant adjustments. Public compliance is not only acquired through ‘buying off’ the public with governmental performance and transfer benefits, but is also manufactured through achieving cultural changes and new ideological foundations for general legitimation. 2022-11-01T10:47:27Z 2022-11-01T10:47:27Z 2022 book 9781909890886 9781909890909 9781909890916 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59128 eng application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.ppc LSE Press 10.31389/lsepress.ppc 10.31389/lsepress.ppc 8996d5ab-b1fc-4644-a5bd-52673e1189fe 9781909890886 9781909890909 9781909890916 282 London open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description Rapid economic growth is often a disruptive social process threatening the social relations and ideologies of incumbent regimes. Yet far from acting defensively, the Chinese Communist Party has lead a major social and economic transformation over forty years, without yet encountering fundamental challenges subverting its rule. A key question for political sociology is thus - how have the logics of China’s governmentality been able to help maintain compliance from the governed while acting so radically to advance the state’s growth priorities? This book explores the issue by analysing the detailed trajectories, rationale, and effects of China’s pension reforms. It uses strong methods, including institutional analysis of resource allocation in the multiple pension schemes and programmes, and quantitative text analysis of the knowledge construction in official discourse along with the reforms. Causal identification estimates the effects of key policy instruments on public opinion about pension responsibility and political trust. Moving beyond the pension issues, the analysis discusses with qualitative evidence why falsified compliance might exist in China’s society and the mechanisms that may lie behind it. Where active counter-conduct (such as resistance) is confined, individuals may choose cognitive rebellion and falsify their public compliance. The Chinese state’s strategy to generate public compliance is hybrid, organic, and dynamic. The state rules society by its customised governance design and constant adjustments. Public compliance is not only acquired through ‘buying off’ the public with governmental performance and transfer benefits, but is also manufactured through achieving cultural changes and new ideological foundations for general legitimation.
title pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
spellingShingle pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
title_short pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
title_full pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
title_fullStr pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
title_full_unstemmed pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
title_sort pension-policy-and-governmentality-in-china.pdf
publisher LSE Press
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.ppc
_version_ 1771297407428984832