10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf

In the 1960s and 1970s this formalist version seen in the previous chapter began to show signs of fatigue. Some critics and art historians began to show interest in the personages on stage in Les Demoiselles. Early on John Nash linked the damsel squatting at lower right of the canvas with the myth o...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Firenze University Press 2022
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-656-8_5
id oapen-20.500.12657-60427
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-604272024-03-27T14:14:58Z Chapter Other Criteria. Problematic Nudes Méndez Baiges, Maite Modernism Demoislles d'Avignon John Nash Leo Steinberg thema EDItEUR::A The Arts In the 1960s and 1970s this formalist version seen in the previous chapter began to show signs of fatigue. Some critics and art historians began to show interest in the personages on stage in Les Demoiselles. Early on John Nash linked the damsel squatting at lower right of the canvas with the myth of Medusa. Leo Steinberg immediately formulated a series of questions that constituted a direct attack against the formalist version. Why should we examine a painting that presented five naked prostitutes, all gazing fixedly at the viewer, merely from the formalist perspective? The time had come to take into account the content of the painting and consequently all of modern art which had been restricted by the prevailing formalism. This chapter tells how the formalist arguments were refuted and cleared the way for the iconological studies that placed the powerful sexual content in the foreground. The person mainly responsible for this was Leo Steinberg who sparked off an authentic revolution on the way to deal with this work and Modernism as a whole. 2022-12-22T16:07:49Z 2022-12-22T16:07:49Z 2022 chapter ONIX_20221222_9788855186568_89 2704-5919 9788855186568 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/60427 eng Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-656-8_5 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8.05 10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8.05 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855186568 242 12 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description In the 1960s and 1970s this formalist version seen in the previous chapter began to show signs of fatigue. Some critics and art historians began to show interest in the personages on stage in Les Demoiselles. Early on John Nash linked the damsel squatting at lower right of the canvas with the myth of Medusa. Leo Steinberg immediately formulated a series of questions that constituted a direct attack against the formalist version. Why should we examine a painting that presented five naked prostitutes, all gazing fixedly at the viewer, merely from the formalist perspective? The time had come to take into account the content of the painting and consequently all of modern art which had been restricted by the prevailing formalism. This chapter tells how the formalist arguments were refuted and cleared the way for the iconological studies that placed the powerful sexual content in the foreground. The person mainly responsible for this was Leo Steinberg who sparked off an authentic revolution on the way to deal with this work and Modernism as a whole.
title 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
spellingShingle 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
title_short 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
title_full 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
title_fullStr 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
title_sort 10_36253_978-88-5518-656-8_05.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press
publishDate 2022
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-656-8_5
_version_ 1799945295975415808