9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf

Memory perspectives on past events allegedly take one of two shapes. In field memories, we recall episodes from a first-person point of view, while in observer memories, we look at a past scene from a third-person perspective. But this mere visuospatial dichotomy faces several practical and conceptu...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Taylor & Francis 2023
id oapen-20.500.12657-61172
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-611722024-03-27T14:14:25Z Chapter 8 Constructing a Wider View on Memory Peeters, Anco Cosentino, Erica Werning, Markus Anja Berninger, Íngrid Vendrell Ferran, Peter Langland-Hassan, Markus Werning, Kourken Michaelian, Kengo Miyazono, Uku Tooming, Christopher Jude McCarroll,Alma Barner, Julia Jansen, Fabrice thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTM Philosophy of mind thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTK Philosophy: epistemology and theory of knowledge Memory perspectives on past events allegedly take one of two shapes. In field memories, we recall episodes from a first-person point of view, while in observer memories, we look at a past scene from a third-person perspective. But this mere visuospatial dichotomy faces several practical and conceptual challenges. First, this binary distinction is not exhaustive. Second, this characterization insufficiently accounts for the phenomenology of observer memories. Third, the focus on the visual aspect of memory perspective neglects emotional, agential, and self-related social aspects. Fourth, the focus on the time of recall neglects the fact that visual, emotional, agential, and social aspects of perspective can also be dissociated in the original experience. In this chapter, we move away from the standard visual dichotomy. Instead, we propose that memory perspective is better understood along four lines: visual, agential, emotional, and social. Drawing on empirical research, we argue that these dimensions predict a disposition to recall a past event based on the present situation of the memorizer. This account supports seeing episodic memory as a natural kind, supported by scenario construction mechanisms and minimal memory traces. By remapping the classic distinction between field and observer perspectives along four dimensions, our proposal provides explanatory advantages and secures practical gains by enabling testable hypotheses. 2023-02-06T10:46:03Z 2023-02-06T10:46:03Z 2023 chapter 9780367708771 9780367720964 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/61172 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf Taylor & Francis Philosophical Perspectives on Memory and Imagination Routledge 10.4324/9781003153429-11 10.4324/9781003153429-11 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 91d50edd-c70a-42c9-ac84-1240d123c93b f8086bb3-4491-4846-8538-b72c95d76c0d 9780367708771 9780367720964 Routledge 27 Radboud Universiteit Radboud University open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description Memory perspectives on past events allegedly take one of two shapes. In field memories, we recall episodes from a first-person point of view, while in observer memories, we look at a past scene from a third-person perspective. But this mere visuospatial dichotomy faces several practical and conceptual challenges. First, this binary distinction is not exhaustive. Second, this characterization insufficiently accounts for the phenomenology of observer memories. Third, the focus on the visual aspect of memory perspective neglects emotional, agential, and self-related social aspects. Fourth, the focus on the time of recall neglects the fact that visual, emotional, agential, and social aspects of perspective can also be dissociated in the original experience. In this chapter, we move away from the standard visual dichotomy. Instead, we propose that memory perspective is better understood along four lines: visual, agential, emotional, and social. Drawing on empirical research, we argue that these dimensions predict a disposition to recall a past event based on the present situation of the memorizer. This account supports seeing episodic memory as a natural kind, supported by scenario construction mechanisms and minimal memory traces. By remapping the classic distinction between field and observer perspectives along four dimensions, our proposal provides explanatory advantages and secures practical gains by enabling testable hypotheses.
title 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
spellingShingle 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
title_short 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
title_full 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
title_fullStr 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
title_sort 9781003153429_10.4324_9781003153429-11.pdf
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1799945300463321088