id |
oapen-20.500.12657-61184
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-611842024-03-27T14:14:25Z The Historical Depth of the Tiberian Reading Tradition of Biblical Hebrew Hornkohl, Aaron D. standard Tiberian Masoretic tradition;Hebrew Bible;written components (consonantal);reading components (vocalic);Tiberian spelling;Tiberian pronunciation thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general::QRAX History of religion thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF13 New Testaments thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF19 Bible readings, selections and meditations thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFF Historical and comparative linguistics This volume explores an underappreciated feature of the standard Tiberian Masoretic tradition of Biblical Hebrew, namely its composite nature. Focusing on cases of dissonance between the tradition’s written (consonantal) and reading (vocalic) components, the study shows that the Tiberian spelling and pronunciation traditions, though related, interdependent, and largely in harmony, at numerous points reflect distinct oral realisations of the biblical text. Where the extant vocalisation differs from the apparently pre-exilic pronunciation presupposed by the written tradition, the former often exhibits conspicuous affinity with post-exilic linguistic conventions as seen in representative Second Temple material, such as the core Late Biblical Hebrew books, the Dead Sea Scrolls, Ben Sira, rabbinic literature, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and contemporary Aramaic and Syriac material. On the one hand, such instances of written-reading disharmony clearly entail a degree of anachronism in the vocalisation of Classical Biblical Hebrew compositions. On the other, since many of the innovative and secondary features in the Tiberian vocalisation tradition are typical of sources from the Second Temple Period and, in some cases, are documented as minority alternatives in even earlier material, the Masoretic reading tradition is justifiably characterised as a linguistic artefact of profound historical depth. 2023-02-07T09:26:52Z 2023-02-07T09:26:52Z 2023 book 9781800649804 9781800649811 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/61184 eng Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 9781800649828.pdf https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/OBP.0310 Open Book Publishers 10.11647/OBP.0310 10.11647/OBP.0310 23117811-c361-47b4-8b76-2c9b160c9a8b 9781800649804 9781800649811 ScholarLed 17 558 Cambridge open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
This volume explores an underappreciated feature of the standard Tiberian Masoretic tradition of Biblical Hebrew, namely its composite nature. Focusing on cases of dissonance between the tradition’s written (consonantal) and reading (vocalic) components, the study shows that the Tiberian spelling and pronunciation traditions, though related, interdependent, and largely in harmony, at numerous points reflect distinct oral realisations of the biblical text. Where the extant vocalisation differs from the apparently pre-exilic pronunciation presupposed by the written tradition, the former often exhibits conspicuous affinity with post-exilic linguistic conventions as seen in representative Second Temple material, such as the core Late Biblical Hebrew books, the Dead Sea Scrolls, Ben Sira, rabbinic literature, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and contemporary Aramaic and Syriac material. On the one hand, such instances of written-reading disharmony clearly entail a degree of anachronism in the vocalisation of Classical Biblical Hebrew compositions. On the other, since many of the innovative and secondary features in the Tiberian vocalisation tradition are typical of sources from the Second Temple Period and, in some cases, are documented as minority alternatives in even earlier material, the Masoretic reading tradition is justifiably characterised as a linguistic artefact of profound historical depth.
|
title |
9781800649828.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
9781800649828.pdf
|
title_short |
9781800649828.pdf
|
title_full |
9781800649828.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
9781800649828.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
9781800649828.pdf
|
title_sort |
9781800649828.pdf
|
publisher |
Open Book Publishers
|
publishDate |
2023
|
url |
https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/OBP.0310
|
_version_ |
1799945255512965120
|