| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-627082024-03-28T08:18:45Z Chapter Per l’edizione del Corbaccio: preliminari allo studio della tradizione Giglio, Lorenzo Boccaccio Corbaccio Manuscript Tradition thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies The paper examines some critical aspects of the manuscript tradition of Boccaccio’s Corbaccio, starting from the results of the very few studies on the subject. Besides proposing an updated list of all the 79 available manuscripts that hand down the work, whose yet we don’t have any critical edition, he then demonstrates, through a number of examples, the benefits of widening perspective to the codes of the non-α family, but also of a comprehensive reconsideration of the status of α itself. In the absence of a solid classification of the whole manuscript tradition, the “traditional” hypothesis that the α2 group (and in particular the Mannelli codex) represents an advanced redaction of Boccaccio’s «umile trattato» risks to be too conditioning if assumed at such a preliminary stage. 2023-05-01T13:41:27Z 2023-05-01T13:41:27Z 2022 chapter ONIX_20230501_9788855186681_124 2704-5919 9788855186681 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62708 ita Studi e saggi application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International chapter-36763.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/978-88-5518-668-1_4 Firenze University Press 10.36253/978-88-5518-668-1.02 The paper examines some critical aspects of the manuscript tradition of Boccaccio’s Corbaccio, starting from the results of the very few studies on the subject. Besides proposing an updated list of all the 79 available manuscripts that hand down the work, whose yet we don’t have any critical edition, he then demonstrates, through a number of examples, the benefits of widening perspective to the codes of the non-α family, but also of a comprehensive reconsideration of the status of α itself. In the absence of a solid classification of the whole manuscript tradition, the “traditional” hypothesis that the α2 group (and in particular the Mannelli codex) represents an advanced redaction of Boccaccio’s «umile trattato» risks to be too conditioning if assumed at such a preliminary stage. 10.36253/978-88-5518-668-1.02 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9788855186681 244 32 Florence open access
|
| description |
The paper examines some critical aspects of the manuscript tradition of Boccaccio’s Corbaccio, starting from the results of the very few studies on the subject. Besides proposing an updated list of all the 79 available manuscripts that hand down the work, whose yet we don’t have any critical edition, he then demonstrates, through a number of examples, the benefits of widening perspective to the codes of the non-α family, but also of a comprehensive reconsideration of the status of α itself. In the absence of a solid classification of the whole manuscript tradition, the “traditional” hypothesis that the α2 group (and in particular the Mannelli codex) represents an advanced redaction of Boccaccio’s «umile trattato» risks to be too conditioning if assumed at such a preliminary stage.
|
