id |
oapen-20.500.12657-62919
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-629192024-03-28T08:18:49Z Chapter 16 Between Adversariness and Compromise Tseronis, Assimakis Serafis, Dimitris topoi; endoxa; political discourse; adversariness; polyphony; speech; debate; government; Greece; troika thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CJ Language teaching and learning thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPH Political structure and processes The chapter reviews the extent to which contemporary Greek scholarship in humanities and social sciences makes use of rhetorical categories as relevant descriptive and analytical tools. It proposes revisiting two classical rhetorical concepts, namely topoi and endoxa, in order to illustrate their descriptive and explanatory potential for the analysis of political discourse characterized by adversariness, polyphony, and the need to create communion. To illustrate this theoretical and methodological proposal, two fragments of parliamentary discourse are analysed by combining the insights of Pragma-Dialectics and the Argumentum Model of Topics. The fragments are from the speeches that the government and opposition leaders held during the parliamentary debate on the signing of the first memorandum of understanding between Greece and the ‘troika’ of the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund in May 2010. 2023-05-08T13:54:50Z 2023-05-08T13:54:50Z 2023 chapter 9781032049441 9781032049458 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62919 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf Taylor & Francis Routledge Handbook of Descriptive Rhetorical Studies and World Languages Routledge 10.4324/9781003195276-20 10.4324/9781003195276-20 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 79b76be2-79e2-4311-9c70-99b5663e1f4d a12bf48d-df3e-48ca-8337-ba076f5cb6ec 9781032049441 9781032049458 Routledge 17 Örebro Universitet Örebro University open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
The chapter reviews the extent to which contemporary Greek scholarship in humanities and social sciences makes use of rhetorical categories as relevant descriptive and analytical tools. It proposes revisiting two classical rhetorical concepts, namely topoi and endoxa, in order to illustrate their descriptive and explanatory potential for the analysis of political discourse characterized by adversariness, polyphony, and the need to create communion. To illustrate this theoretical and methodological proposal, two fragments of parliamentary discourse are analysed by combining the insights of Pragma-Dialectics and the Argumentum Model of Topics. The fragments are from the speeches that the government and opposition leaders held during the parliamentary debate on the signing of the first memorandum of understanding between Greece and the ‘troika’ of the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund in May 2010.
|
title |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
title_short |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
title_full |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
title_sort |
9781032049441_10.43249781003195276_20.pdf
|
publisher |
Taylor & Francis
|
publishDate |
2023
|
_version_ |
1799945281575321600
|