9791221501063-29.pdf

The Delphi-based scenarios (DBS) development implies the assumption of different choices, through the gathering of information and the assessment of alternative resolutions (Panpatte and Takale, 2019). During the last decades, the spread of environmental hazards has increased quickly, much to reques...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Firenze University Press, Genova University Press 2023
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0106-3_29
id oapen-20.500.12657-74901
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-749012023-08-03T17:59:37Z Chapter A Natural Language Processing approach to measure expertise in the Delphi-based scenarios Calleo, Yuri Di Zio, Simone Pilla, Francesco future scenarios Delphi expertise assessment bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences The Delphi-based scenarios (DBS) development implies the assumption of different choices, through the gathering of information and the assessment of alternative resolutions (Panpatte and Takale, 2019). During the last decades, the spread of environmental hazards has increased quickly, much to request different responses in order to develop a sustainable future for humanity planning the present (McMichael and Lindgren, 2011). Since the DBS is a creative process (Nowack et al., 2011), different figures are selected to make choices, including academics, stakeholders and citizens. However, one of the main challenges remains the measurement of expertise, in fact, during the process, the experts should be assessed based on their competences in order to avoid any conflict in the final results and, eventually, weigh their answers. In recent years, some contributions adopted the self-assessments for the experts’ evaluation (Sossa et al., 2019), but many issues still remain (such as strong subjectivity and cognitive biases which produce over or underestimation). We develop a new method to estimate the expertise by using Natural Language Processing to acquire information, extracting the contributions of experts in each topic. First, starting from a draft list of selected experts, we identify the category of reference (e.g., academia, industry, local authority, citizens etc.). We build a data repository with the personal pages (URLs) of each expert to then use Python to extract from the URLs, the number of contributions related to a keyword, different for each category (e.g., publications for academics, reports and projects for stakeholders etc.). Finally, we proceed adopting a coefficient of production with a weighted sum of the results. To practically demonstrate our approach, we applied this method to a cohort of known experts, part of the “Smart control of the climate resilience” (SCORE) H2020 European project to estimate their expertise in specific areas. 2023-08-03T15:06:10Z 2023-08-03T15:06:10Z 2023 chapter ONIX_20230803_9791221501063_97 2704-5846 9791221501063 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/74901 eng Proceedings e report application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 9791221501063-29.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0106-3_29 Firenze University Press, Genova University Press ASA 2022 Data-Driven Decision Making 10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.29 10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.29 9223d3ac-6fd2-44c9-bb99-5b98ca9d2fad 863aa499-dbee-4191-9a14-3b5d5ef9e635 9791221501063 134 6 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description The Delphi-based scenarios (DBS) development implies the assumption of different choices, through the gathering of information and the assessment of alternative resolutions (Panpatte and Takale, 2019). During the last decades, the spread of environmental hazards has increased quickly, much to request different responses in order to develop a sustainable future for humanity planning the present (McMichael and Lindgren, 2011). Since the DBS is a creative process (Nowack et al., 2011), different figures are selected to make choices, including academics, stakeholders and citizens. However, one of the main challenges remains the measurement of expertise, in fact, during the process, the experts should be assessed based on their competences in order to avoid any conflict in the final results and, eventually, weigh their answers. In recent years, some contributions adopted the self-assessments for the experts’ evaluation (Sossa et al., 2019), but many issues still remain (such as strong subjectivity and cognitive biases which produce over or underestimation). We develop a new method to estimate the expertise by using Natural Language Processing to acquire information, extracting the contributions of experts in each topic. First, starting from a draft list of selected experts, we identify the category of reference (e.g., academia, industry, local authority, citizens etc.). We build a data repository with the personal pages (URLs) of each expert to then use Python to extract from the URLs, the number of contributions related to a keyword, different for each category (e.g., publications for academics, reports and projects for stakeholders etc.). Finally, we proceed adopting a coefficient of production with a weighted sum of the results. To practically demonstrate our approach, we applied this method to a cohort of known experts, part of the “Smart control of the climate resilience” (SCORE) H2020 European project to estimate their expertise in specific areas.
title 9791221501063-29.pdf
spellingShingle 9791221501063-29.pdf
title_short 9791221501063-29.pdf
title_full 9791221501063-29.pdf
title_fullStr 9791221501063-29.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9791221501063-29.pdf
title_sort 9791221501063-29.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press, Genova University Press
publishDate 2023
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0106-3_29
_version_ 1799945255641939968