9791221501063-55.pdf

This work evaluates the forecasting performances of different models using data on Italian unemployment and employment rates over the years 2004-2022 at the monthly frequency. The logic of this work is inspired by the series of M-Competitions, i.e. the tradition of competitions organized to test the...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Firenze University Press, Genova University Press 2023
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0106-3_55
id oapen-20.500.12657-74927
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-749272023-08-03T17:59:37Z Chapter Given N forecasting models, what to do? Culotta, Fabrizio Forecasting performances M-Competitions Model types Model ensemble techniques Decision-making and forecast accuracy bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences This work evaluates the forecasting performances of different models using data on Italian unemployment and employment rates over the years 2004-2022 at the monthly frequency. The logic of this work is inspired by the series of M-Competitions, i.e. the tradition of competitions organized to test the forecasting performances of classical and innovative models. Given N competing models, only one winner is selected. The types of forecasting models range from the Exponential Smoothing family to ARIMA-like models, to their hybridization, to machine learning and neural network engines. Model combinations through various ensemble techniques are also considered. Once the observational period is split between the training and test set, the estimated forecasting models are ranked in terms of fitting on the training set and in terms of their forecast accuracy on the test set. Results confirm that it does not exist yet a single superior universal model. On the contrary, the ranking of different forecasting models is specific to the adopted training set. Secondly, results confirm that performances of machine learning and neural network models offer satisfactory alternatives and complementarities to the traditional models like ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing. Finally, the results stress the importance of model ensemble techniques as a solution to model uncertainty as well as a tool to improve forecast accuracy. The flexibility provided by a rich set of different forecasting models, and the possibility of combining them, together represent an advantage for decision-makers often constrained to adopt solely pure, not-combined, forecasting models. Overall, this work can represent a first step toward the construction of a semi-automatic forecasting algorithm, which has become an essential tool for both trained and untrained eyes in an era of data-driven decision-making. 2023-08-03T15:07:08Z 2023-08-03T15:07:08Z 2023 chapter ONIX_20230803_9791221501063_123 2704-5846 9791221501063 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/74927 eng Proceedings e report application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 9791221501063-55.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0106-3_55 Firenze University Press, Genova University Press ASA 2022 Data-Driven Decision Making 10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.55 10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.55 9223d3ac-6fd2-44c9-bb99-5b98ca9d2fad 863aa499-dbee-4191-9a14-3b5d5ef9e635 9791221501063 134 6 Florence open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description This work evaluates the forecasting performances of different models using data on Italian unemployment and employment rates over the years 2004-2022 at the monthly frequency. The logic of this work is inspired by the series of M-Competitions, i.e. the tradition of competitions organized to test the forecasting performances of classical and innovative models. Given N competing models, only one winner is selected. The types of forecasting models range from the Exponential Smoothing family to ARIMA-like models, to their hybridization, to machine learning and neural network engines. Model combinations through various ensemble techniques are also considered. Once the observational period is split between the training and test set, the estimated forecasting models are ranked in terms of fitting on the training set and in terms of their forecast accuracy on the test set. Results confirm that it does not exist yet a single superior universal model. On the contrary, the ranking of different forecasting models is specific to the adopted training set. Secondly, results confirm that performances of machine learning and neural network models offer satisfactory alternatives and complementarities to the traditional models like ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing. Finally, the results stress the importance of model ensemble techniques as a solution to model uncertainty as well as a tool to improve forecast accuracy. The flexibility provided by a rich set of different forecasting models, and the possibility of combining them, together represent an advantage for decision-makers often constrained to adopt solely pure, not-combined, forecasting models. Overall, this work can represent a first step toward the construction of a semi-automatic forecasting algorithm, which has become an essential tool for both trained and untrained eyes in an era of data-driven decision-making.
title 9791221501063-55.pdf
spellingShingle 9791221501063-55.pdf
title_short 9791221501063-55.pdf
title_full 9791221501063-55.pdf
title_fullStr 9791221501063-55.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9791221501063-55.pdf
title_sort 9791221501063-55.pdf
publisher Firenze University Press, Genova University Press
publishDate 2023
url https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0106-3_55
_version_ 1799945260640501760