9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf

While definiteness encodes the information that the sender assumes that the addressee has, specificity encodes the knowledge that the sender has and the anchoring to an item. The chapter focuses on lexical determiners and non-manual marking. As the example below shows, the use of this sign does not...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Taylor & Francis 2023
id oapen-20.500.12657-76454
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-764542024-03-28T09:47:51Z Chapter 18 Specificity and Definiteness Barberà, Gemma Experimental, handbook, language, phonological, research, sign, theoretical, comprehension, conventions, interrogatives, While definiteness encodes the information that the sender assumes that the addressee has, specificity encodes the knowledge that the sender has and the anchoring to an item. The chapter focuses on lexical determiners and non-manual marking. As the example below shows, the use of this sign does not have a pejorative meaning, as it can be used in a context where the discourse referent helps the sender. The reading in corresponds to an epistemically specific discourse referent, which is thus identifiable by the sender. The reading in corresponds to an epistemically non-specific and unidentifiable discourse referent. Definiteness and specificity are two interrelated but independent notions. Sign languages are provided with a rich array of lexical signs expressing indefiniteness, but to the best of my knowledge, only few lexical signs have been claimed so far to be specialized for a definiteness. 2023-09-27T12:40:34Z 2023-09-27T12:40:34Z 2021 chapter 9781138801998 9780367640996 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/76454 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf Taylor & Francis The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research Routledge 10.4324/9781315754499-18 10.4324/9781315754499-18 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 3f085e74-5c1f-431c-932e-b2c6d6a41db3 8ece0728-d36b-453a-b443-5923b97c04c3 9781138801998 9780367640996 Routledge 21 Universitat Pompeu Fabra Pompeu Fabra University open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description While definiteness encodes the information that the sender assumes that the addressee has, specificity encodes the knowledge that the sender has and the anchoring to an item. The chapter focuses on lexical determiners and non-manual marking. As the example below shows, the use of this sign does not have a pejorative meaning, as it can be used in a context where the discourse referent helps the sender. The reading in corresponds to an epistemically specific discourse referent, which is thus identifiable by the sender. The reading in corresponds to an epistemically non-specific and unidentifiable discourse referent. Definiteness and specificity are two interrelated but independent notions. Sign languages are provided with a rich array of lexical signs expressing indefiniteness, but to the best of my knowledge, only few lexical signs have been claimed so far to be specialized for a definiteness.
title 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
spellingShingle 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
title_short 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
title_full 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
title_fullStr 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
title_sort 9781315754499_10.4324_9781315754499-18.pdf
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1799945205045002240