9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf

Drawing on interview data collected in three projects exploring domestic abuse in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships, this chapter examines sexual consent in LGB and/or T+ people’s abusive relationships through a queer lens. Three themes are considered. First, Catherine Donovan and Marian...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Taylor & Francis 2023
id oapen-20.500.12657-86188
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-861882023-12-16T02:25:34Z Chapter 11 ‘I wasn’t aware at the time, I could actually say “no”’ Donovan, Catherine Butterby, Kate Barnes, Rebecca intersectionality, misogyny, feminism, violence, race bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JF Society & culture: general::JFS Social groups::JFSJ Gender studies, gender groups Drawing on interview data collected in three projects exploring domestic abuse in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships, this chapter examines sexual consent in LGB and/or T+ people’s abusive relationships through a queer lens. Three themes are considered. First, Catherine Donovan and Marianne Hester’s two ‘relationship rules’ underpinning abusive relationships are applied. These determine that the relationship is for the abusive partner and on their terms; and that the victim/survivor is responsible for everything, including their partner’s abusive behaviour. Participants’ accounts show how these relationship rules can delegitimate victim/survivors’ attempts to exercise consent and conversely legitimate non-consensual sex. Second, Carole Pateman’s ‘sexual contract’ is drawn upon to demonstrate how abusive partners mandate sex whenever and however they wish, while victimised partners feel duty-bound to acquiesce. This, it is argued, reproduces cis-heteronormative sexual scripts based on public stories about love and intimacy and conventionally gendered binaries such as initiator/follower. Third, accounts demonstrating how more experienced LGB and/or T+ partners can exercise experiential power to instil norms about sex and intimacy are analysed. It is concluded that these abusive practices frame the context in which sexual victimisation occurs in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships and inhibit victims/survivors from recognising and naming sexual violence. 2023-12-15T14:25:01Z 2023-12-15T14:25:01Z 2024 chapter 9781032429625 9781032429632 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/86188 eng application/pdf Attribution 4.0 International 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf Taylor & Francis Consent Routledge 10.4324/9781003365082-14 10.4324/9781003365082-14 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 67d40a39-0add-4604-9a0b-42ea3ece1cae 19e26115-460c-4817-a2b2-7b9fdd49f58d 9781032429625 9781032429632 Routledge 17 Durham University open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description Drawing on interview data collected in three projects exploring domestic abuse in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships, this chapter examines sexual consent in LGB and/or T+ people’s abusive relationships through a queer lens. Three themes are considered. First, Catherine Donovan and Marianne Hester’s two ‘relationship rules’ underpinning abusive relationships are applied. These determine that the relationship is for the abusive partner and on their terms; and that the victim/survivor is responsible for everything, including their partner’s abusive behaviour. Participants’ accounts show how these relationship rules can delegitimate victim/survivors’ attempts to exercise consent and conversely legitimate non-consensual sex. Second, Carole Pateman’s ‘sexual contract’ is drawn upon to demonstrate how abusive partners mandate sex whenever and however they wish, while victimised partners feel duty-bound to acquiesce. This, it is argued, reproduces cis-heteronormative sexual scripts based on public stories about love and intimacy and conventionally gendered binaries such as initiator/follower. Third, accounts demonstrating how more experienced LGB and/or T+ partners can exercise experiential power to instil norms about sex and intimacy are analysed. It is concluded that these abusive practices frame the context in which sexual victimisation occurs in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships and inhibit victims/survivors from recognising and naming sexual violence.
title 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
spellingShingle 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
title_short 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
title_full 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
title_fullStr 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
title_full_unstemmed 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
title_sort 9781003365082_10.4324_9781003365082-14.pdf
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1799945198966407168