id |
oapen-20.500.12657-87884
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-878842024-03-28T14:03:21Z Left-Kantianism in the Marburg School Widmer, Elisabeth Theresia Neo-Kantianismus soziales und politisches Denken Alternativen zum Marxismus Geschichte der westlichen Philosophie Neo-Kantianism social and political thought alternatives to Marxism history of western philosophy thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800 Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. ; Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. 2024-02-23T13:31:26Z 2024-02-23T13:31:26Z 2024 book ONIX_20240223_9783111331843_81 9783111331843 9783111331904 9783111331775 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/87884 eng New Studies in the History and Historiography of Philosophy application/pdf n/a 9783111331843.pdf https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111331843/html?lang=en De Gruyter De Gruyter 10.1515/9783111331843 10.1515/9783111331843 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 9783111331843 9783111331904 9783111331775 De Gruyter 13 154 Berlin/Boston open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. ; Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue.
|
title |
9783111331843.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
9783111331843.pdf
|
title_short |
9783111331843.pdf
|
title_full |
9783111331843.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
9783111331843.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
9783111331843.pdf
|
title_sort |
9783111331843.pdf
|
publisher |
De Gruyter
|
publishDate |
2024
|
url |
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111331843/html?lang=en
|
_version_ |
1799945232758865920
|