| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-892592024-04-03T02:25:14Z Chapter Desinenze di vocativo come formanti antroponimici. I nomi propri maschili in -e e -o nelle lingue slave Trovesi, Andrea Vocative endings Proper noun formation Slavic languages thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DS Literature: history and criticism The study tests the hypothesis according to which the Slavic anthroponyms in -e and -o underwent evolution from vocative endings to hypocoristic derivative suffixes and then to anthroponymic formants. According to the Author, such a hypothesis can be considered entirely plausible, albeit only as a mechanism of formation parallel to and intertwined with other processes of morphemic function change. As a phenomenon observable in both diachrony and synchrony, categorial lability between vocative and word formation can thus be considered inherent in the system of Slavic languages. However the anthroponyms in -e and -o have had different diffusion and distribution in the various Slavic languages and today occupy dissimilar places within the system and varieties of each language. 2024-04-02T15:51:08Z 2024-04-02T15:51:08Z 2023 chapter ONIX_20240402_9791221502169_228 2612-7679 9791221502169 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/89259 ita Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici application/pdf n/a 9791221502169_07.pdf https://books.fupress.com/doi/capitoli/979-12-215-0216-9_7 Firenze University Press 10.36253/979-12-215-0216-9.07 The study tests the hypothesis according to which the Slavic anthroponyms in -e and -o underwent evolution from vocative endings to hypocoristic derivative suffixes and then to anthroponymic formants. According to the Author, such a hypothesis can be considered entirely plausible, albeit only as a mechanism of formation parallel to and intertwined with other processes of morphemic function change. As a phenomenon observable in both diachrony and synchrony, categorial lability between vocative and word formation can thus be considered inherent in the system of Slavic languages. However the anthroponyms in -e and -o have had different diffusion and distribution in the various Slavic languages and today occupy dissimilar places within the system and varieties of each language. 10.36253/979-12-215-0216-9.07 bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870 9791221502169 54 8 Florence open access
|
