| spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-900382024-04-30T02:24:45Z Rethinking Governance in Europe and Northeast Asia Wissenbach, Uwe Integrate NATO Command;EU State Aid Rule;polycentric governance;ECB President;EU governance model;EU’s Emission Trading System;green national industrial policy;EU Financial Market;multilateralism;CCP Leadership;nationalism;EU Climate Policy;Poly-centric Governance;EU’s Management;IMF Programme;Bond Buying Programme;EU Multilateralism;National Security Strategy;West Germany;EU Integration;Imjin War;Military Expenditure;Gdp Term;Northeast Asian Countries;Financial Safety Nets;Moralisation Gaps;CMI thema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTM Regional / International studies thema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTP Development studies thema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KC Economics::KCP Political economy thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTS Social and political philosophy thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPF Political ideologies and movements::JPFN Nationalism This book explores how nationalism and multilateralism transform international society and global governance. It does so by comparing the governance model of the EU – a constitutionalised and increasingly polycentric form of multilateralism – with Northeast Asia. There nationalist administrations have resisted multilateral commitments and are locked into rivalries instead of pursuing a regional project. Both Europe and Northeast Asia can be seen as success stories of the late 20th/ early 21st centuries, but by having followed different approaches to international governance. The book traces these two trajectories through critical junctures in history to how both regions have dealt with the contemporary challenges of the financial crisis and climate change. During the financial crisis, Europe’s multilateral economic and monetary architecture revealed profound weaknesses whilst national policies allowed much of Northeast Asia to escape the worst of it. On climate change the European Union (EU) has developed effort-sharing governance models to reduce emissions, while Northeast Asian countries are relying on greening national industrial policy. The book argues that global governance has to find the balance between multilateralism and nationalism in order to find collaborative approaches to global challenges. This book provides a fresh take on the EU and on Northeast Asia and develops innovative concepts of international society and polycentric governance. Thus, it will be of considerable interest to researchers and students of global governance, international relations, EU and Asia Studies. 2024-04-26T12:05:35Z 2024-04-26T12:05:35Z 2020 book 9781000707021 9781032086576 9780367321666 9780429317125 9781000707113 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/90038 eng application/pdf Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 9781000706932.pdf Taylor & Francis Routledge 10.4324/9780429317125 10.4324/9780429317125 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb 9781000707021 9781032086576 9780367321666 9780429317125 9781000707113 Routledge 237 open access
|
| description |
This book explores how nationalism and multilateralism transform international society and global governance. It does so by comparing the governance model of the EU – a constitutionalised and increasingly polycentric form of multilateralism – with Northeast Asia. There nationalist administrations have resisted multilateral commitments and are locked into rivalries instead of pursuing a regional project.
Both Europe and Northeast Asia can be seen as success stories of the late 20th/ early 21st centuries, but by having followed different approaches to international governance. The book traces these two trajectories through critical junctures in history to how both regions have dealt with the contemporary challenges of the financial crisis and climate change. During the financial crisis, Europe’s multilateral economic and monetary architecture revealed profound weaknesses whilst national policies allowed much of Northeast Asia to escape the worst of it. On climate change the European Union (EU) has developed effort-sharing governance models to reduce emissions, while Northeast Asian countries are relying on greening national industrial policy. The book argues that global governance has to find the balance between multilateralism and nationalism in order to find collaborative approaches to global challenges.
This book provides a fresh take on the EU and on Northeast Asia and develops innovative concepts of international society and polycentric governance. Thus, it will be of considerable interest to researchers and students of global governance, international relations, EU and Asia Studies.
|
