dead-mens-propaganda.pdf

In Dead Men’s Propaganda: Ideology and Utopia in Comparative Communications Studies, Terhi Rantanen investigates the shaping of early comparative communications research between the 1920s and 1950s, notably the work of academics and men of practice in the United States. Often neglected, this intelle...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: LSE Press 2024
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.wmf
id oapen-20.500.12657-90243
record_format dspace
spelling oapen-20.500.12657-902432024-05-16T02:23:03Z Dead Men’s Propaganda Rantanen, Terhi Propaganda; Media; Comparative communications thema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KN Industry and industrial studies::KNT Media, entertainment, information and communication industries In Dead Men’s Propaganda: Ideology and Utopia in Comparative Communications Studies, Terhi Rantanen investigates the shaping of early comparative communications research between the 1920s and 1950s, notably the work of academics and men of practice in the United States. Often neglected, this intellectual thread is highly relevant to understanding the 21st-century’s challenges of war and rival streams of propaganda. Borrowing her conceptual lenses from Karl Mannheim and Robert Merton, Rantanen draws on detailed archival research and case studies to analyse the extent and importance of work outside and inside the academy, illuminating the work of pioneers in the field. Some of these were well-known academics such as Harold Lasswell and the authors of the seminal book Four Theories of the Press. Others operated in the world of news agencies, such as Associated Press's Kent Cooper, or were marginalised as émigré scholars, notably Paul Kecskemeti and Nathan Leites. Her study shows how comparative communications, from its very beginning, can be understood as governed by the Mannheimian concepts of ideology and utopia and the power play between them. The close relationship between these two concepts resulted in a bias in knowledge production, contributed to dominant narratives of generational conflicts, and to the demarcation of Insiders and Outsiders. By focusing on a generation at the forefront of comparative communications at this pivotal time in the 20th century, this book challenges orthodoxies in the intellectual histories of communication studies. 2024-05-15T09:21:46Z 2024-05-15T09:21:46Z 2024 book 9781911712183 9781911712206 9781911712213 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/90243 eng application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International dead-mens-propaganda.pdf https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.wmf LSE Press 10.31389/lsepress.wmf 10.31389/lsepress.wmf 8996d5ab-b1fc-4644-a5bd-52673e1189fe 9781911712183 9781911712206 9781911712213 363 London open access
institution OAPEN
collection DSpace
language English
description In Dead Men’s Propaganda: Ideology and Utopia in Comparative Communications Studies, Terhi Rantanen investigates the shaping of early comparative communications research between the 1920s and 1950s, notably the work of academics and men of practice in the United States. Often neglected, this intellectual thread is highly relevant to understanding the 21st-century’s challenges of war and rival streams of propaganda. Borrowing her conceptual lenses from Karl Mannheim and Robert Merton, Rantanen draws on detailed archival research and case studies to analyse the extent and importance of work outside and inside the academy, illuminating the work of pioneers in the field. Some of these were well-known academics such as Harold Lasswell and the authors of the seminal book Four Theories of the Press. Others operated in the world of news agencies, such as Associated Press's Kent Cooper, or were marginalised as émigré scholars, notably Paul Kecskemeti and Nathan Leites. Her study shows how comparative communications, from its very beginning, can be understood as governed by the Mannheimian concepts of ideology and utopia and the power play between them. The close relationship between these two concepts resulted in a bias in knowledge production, contributed to dominant narratives of generational conflicts, and to the demarcation of Insiders and Outsiders. By focusing on a generation at the forefront of comparative communications at this pivotal time in the 20th century, this book challenges orthodoxies in the intellectual histories of communication studies.
title dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
spellingShingle dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
title_short dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
title_full dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
title_fullStr dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
title_full_unstemmed dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
title_sort dead-mens-propaganda.pdf
publisher LSE Press
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.wmf
_version_ 1799945236478164992