id |
oapen-20.500.12657-23685
|
record_format |
dspace
|
spelling |
oapen-20.500.12657-236852024-03-22T19:23:03Z Chapter 14 Quantitative tests of implicational verb hierarchies Wichmann, Søren Kageyama, Taro Jacobsen, Wesley M. Valency Japanese Language Typology thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics This chapter will begin by discussing the implicational verb hierarchy of Tsunoda (1985) as a convenient starting point for looking at what happens when are latively large dataset and a principled, quantitative approach to their analysis are brought to bear on a linguistic typological hypothesis. After introducing new methods for assessing the validity of an implicational hierarchy, I go on to inquire into the presence of implicational hierarchies governing the distribution of 5 different alternation types across 87 verb meanings and 22 languages (Ainu, Balinese, Bezhta, Bora, Chintang, Eastern Armenian, Even, German, Hokkaido Japanese, Hoocąk, Icelandic, Italian, Ket, Mandarin Chinese [henceforth ‘Mandarin’], Mandinka, Mapudungun, Mitsukaido Japanese, Modern Standard Arabic [henceforth ‘Arabic’], Russian, Yaqui, Yucatec Maya, and Zenzontepec Chatino).1The data used are from the database of the Leipzig Valency Classes Project(Hartmann et al. 2013) in the state it was in as of July 17, 2012, although the names used to designate different alternations have been updated. 2019-11-20 23:55 2020-01-07 16:47:06 2020-04-01T09:26:02Z 2020-04-01T09:26:02Z 2016 chapter 1006459 OCN: 1135854536 9783110610697; 9783110475302 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23685 eng application/pdf n/a 62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf De Gruyter Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Studies on Japanese and Beyond 10.1515/9783110477153-015 10.1515/9783110477153-015 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 d146fb52-d976-4b77-970b-4304d0e855e3 7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79 9783110610697; 9783110475302 European Research Council (ERC) Berlin/Boston 295918 FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) open access
|
institution |
OAPEN
|
collection |
DSpace
|
language |
English
|
description |
This chapter will begin by discussing the implicational verb hierarchy of Tsunoda (1985) as a convenient starting point for looking at what happens when are latively large dataset and a principled, quantitative approach to their analysis are brought to bear on a linguistic typological hypothesis. After introducing new methods for assessing the validity of an implicational hierarchy, I go on to inquire into the presence of implicational hierarchies governing the distribution of 5 different alternation types across 87 verb meanings and 22 languages (Ainu, Balinese, Bezhta, Bora, Chintang, Eastern Armenian, Even, German, Hokkaido Japanese, Hoocąk, Icelandic, Italian, Ket, Mandarin Chinese [henceforth ‘Mandarin’], Mandinka, Mapudungun, Mitsukaido Japanese, Modern Standard Arabic [henceforth ‘Arabic’], Russian, Yaqui, Yucatec Maya, and Zenzontepec Chatino).1The data used are from the database of the Leipzig Valency Classes Project(Hartmann et al. 2013) in the state it was in as of July 17, 2012, although the names used to designate different alternations have been updated.
|
title |
62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf
|
spellingShingle |
62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf
|
title_short |
62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf
|
title_full |
62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf
|
title_fullStr |
62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf
|
title_full_unstemmed |
62_[9783110477153 - Transitivity] 14. Quantitative.pdf
|
title_sort |
62_[9783110477153 - transitivity] 14. quantitative.pdf
|
publisher |
De Gruyter
|
publishDate |
2019
|
_version_ |
1799945280691372032
|