Value at Risk (VaR). Empirical parametric models and evaluation

We compare the performance of two parametric methods with one non parametric for day-to-day Value-at-Risk models for 63 stocks traded in NYSE or NASDAQ for three different sample sizes and two significance levels. We find that Historical Simulation is more accurate, but also more dependent on its pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ιωαννίδης, Μιχαήλ
Other Authors: Βενέτης, Ιωάννης
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10889/10894
Description
Summary:We compare the performance of two parametric methods with one non parametric for day-to-day Value-at-Risk models for 63 stocks traded in NYSE or NASDAQ for three different sample sizes and two significance levels. We find that Historical Simulation is more accurate, but also more dependent on its past VaR violations than GARCH and Variance Covariance model.